I remember the days when bugs in x86 CPUs were almost unheard of. The Pentium FDIV bug and the F00F bug were considered these unicorn things.
this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
217 points (99.5% liked)
Technology
72702 readers
2971 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
This isn't really the same kind of bug. Those bugs made instructions emit the wrong answer, which is obviously really bad, and they're really rare. The bugs in the article make instructions take different amounts of time depending on what else the CPU has done recently, which isn't something anyone would notice except that by asking the kernel to do something and measuring the time to execute affected instructions, an attacker that only had usermode access could learn secrets that should only be available to the kernel.
Why are they mentioning only Windows?
Thanks. So zen 5 seems fine and patch for 3 and 4 will come with a newer kernel.
Perhaps because it came from a Microsoft report. Maybe they only know of this being fixed in Windows? I would assume it'd affect all OSs but then again, I certainly do not know enough about these things to understand what's going wrong here.
That'd be my assumption as well, but journalists ~~better~~ have to do better
"PCs run Windows. I have a Mac, which is not a PC." - Average Tech Journalist.