this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
159 points (96.5% liked)

News

29616 readers
2954 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Cellphone bans in schools are gaining bipartisan momentum, with at least eight states, including California, Florida, and Virginia, enacting restrictions to combat classroom distractions and protect children’s mental health.

Governors from both parties, such as Arkansas' Sarah Huckabee Sanders and California's Gavin Newsom, support these measures, citing benefits of phone-free school days.

While some parents oppose bans, citing emergencies and transportation needs, proponents argue phones disrupt learning and may pose risks during crises.

States differ on implementation, from outright bans to district-level policies or funding for phone storage solutions.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Have you guys tried banning usage of phones? Like literally just that? Having a phone im your pocket is one thing, but not being allowed to use it except for X is an option. X= a room, a special time or "just to look up school schedule info"

This works...it doesn't have to work 100%, eveb 80% is enough.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

My mom was a teacher in America. The problem is that students simply don’t listen. Her entire day was spent trying to either police the use of cell phones or overcome language and reading difficulties. Handing out consequences to more than a few students would negatively affect her review, so she had to let a lot of things slide to address the worst offenders if she wanted to keep her job.

Banning phone use would probably work if we didn’t have such an overcrowded and broken educational system already, but as it stands now, there are only maybe 1-2 students per year who are actually able to get a quality education, and that is entirely due to their own self motivation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Ban guns first. Else let students call or text their parents when a shooter gets to school.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The main beneficiaries of this will be bad or abusive teachers. How many videos have you seen of a teacher going on a racist rant or something? Now the kids will have no proof, and no way to shed light on the issue by posting it to social media.

Cell phones are essential kit these days that everyone carries and relies on. They should be integrated into the classroom. We're supposed to be teaching these kids how to survive in this society, right?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

That's bullshit. If your system allows abusive teachers then the system is messed up. Also you're telling me that beside school shootings, no healthcare they also have to look out after abusive teachers?

Great country my ass

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's a nice idea in theory but have you seen the world we live in? There's always some abusive fucks looking to exploit whatever weaknesses there are in all of the systems we have.

I don't agree with the other poster's bit about integrating cell phones into the lessons themselves, but I do think they make a good point about a ban restricting students' ability to expose abusers.

Though one way to get the best of both would be to put cameras in classrooms just like a lot of school busses do now. Eliminate or reduce the he said/she said as much as possible. It would also protect teachers from students that realize accusations on their own can be pretty powerful in environments that do want to prevent abuses and be good for kids who don't have bad intentions but teachers might feel a need to keep them at arm's length to avoid that situation.

It really sucks that positive relationships seem to be more rare these days because people are so fearful about either giving the impression of having a negative relationship and others can be quick to suspect closeness been adults and children has ulterior motives.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Cameras are an even worse idea.

Sure let's record every single thing kids say and do in school on crappy government servers with piss security, oh and let parents see everything they do that way they can control everything they do and say. I'm sure that won't cause any psychological problems.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Not that having cell phones all the time doesn't potentially create psychological problems itself, even before social media is considered.

Though IMO the way to deal with controlling and abusive parents is to encourage kids to talk about their home life because parents like that will cause issues even without extra ammo of seeing what they kid says when they aren't around.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mean, they exist yeah. I've seen plenty of videos of a teacher going off the deep end, who were fired after the video went viral. Take away phones and we're back to my childhood where nobody believed the students because they couldn't provide proof.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

What should've I expect from a country that votes for a mentally ill criminal. Guess History is bound to repeat again and again.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Easy compromise here… ban smart phones, not cell phones.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Snake will rise again

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

How do the chartreuse states feel about it?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

Me, going on 48: “they let kids have cellphones in school?”

load more comments
view more: next ›