this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
1049 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

72669 readers
3561 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

she was only installed as a lightning rod for Musk for criticism nothing more.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 hours ago

Elon neuralinked into Grok AI, and mechahitler was the result.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I would imagine she knew full well trying to be the CEO of X/Twitter with Musk so heavily involved was going to be a losing venture as far as her own goals from the jump. But she took the job for the huge pay day and being able to have "CEO" in her list of previous positions on her resume.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I like the theory of the CV, but that thing is a shit stain rather than a valuable experience

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago

Respectfully, this is not how it works up at that level of the machine.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 19 hours ago

I think she had a discussion with Musk about the AI and didn't like his answer. Escape before she is caught in the shit storm that is coming. Dunno. I don't make enough to speculate what a CEO would do.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of people in this thread are falling for the classic weasel headline reporting trick of using the word "after" to imply a connection, when there's zero evidence in the article body to suggest it means anything other than two different events happened a day apart.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Exactly. A top executive leaving is rarely a snap decision, especially for companies that aren't publicly traded. I think the more likely explanation is that she joined under the assumption that Musk would let her handle things, and now Musk is wanting to get more involved now that his stint in DOGE is over, and she's not a fan of that. This was probably in the works for a month or two, and only announced today.

I also have no evidence for this, other than an understanding in how executive handoffs usually happen. Given her history at X, I highly doubt Grok would be what pushes her out.

load more comments
view more: next ›