this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out [email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The last resort according to whom? It's no law of nature or physics.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The last resort according to basic self preservation.

The other side have guns too. What do you think they're gonna do when you start killing their people?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they're already shooting. that's why we're mad in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And sure, shoot at the fucker that's a threat to you. That's no justification to shoot at persons 2 and 3 that had similar belief systems but wasn't shooting at you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The right is already directly and indirectly killing innocent people.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, the entire right wing is killing people? So how much blood is on the hands of the elderly couple down the road that go to church every Sunday?

Such rhetoric is not only incredibly immature and lacking of insight, it encourages the extremism that leads to violence. Grow up.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The right as in the political right wing in the context of Spain.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ohhh okay. So, the political right wing of Spain, which is far less prone to political violence than that of, say, America?

Do you not understand how introducing violence to that equation is an even worse idea?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Violence is already in the equation. Do you want there to be no response to the attacks on marginalized groups?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, you said right wing in the context of Spain, of which there has been only one single incident since the 1980s, and no one was hurt or killed in that singular instance.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far-right_terrorism_in_Spain

Violence is very much not in the equation in the context you yourself mentioned.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The national police did nothing wrong during the catalan referendum and riots. No politicians are advocating for the genocide of refugees by sending them back to the opressive regimes they're escaping from. No politicians are advocating for the genocide of queer people by spreading harmful retoric that leads them to suicide. There are no apologists of the Franco regime in the government.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

The national police did nothing wrong during the catalan referendum and riots.

Wasn't a far-right thing.

No politicians are advocating for the genocide of refugees by sending them back to the opressive regimes they’re escaping from.

Executing politicians would not solve this. It would instead make the anti immigration crowd violent.

No politicians are advocating for the genocide of queer people by spreading harmful retoric that leads them to suicide.

Spain is one of the world leaders in LGBTQ+ freedom. There is too much pro LGBTQ+ support here to make this a viable campaign platform. Making martyrs out of anti LGBTQ+ politicians will boost support for anti LGBTQ+ stances, not lower it.

There are no apologists of the Franco regime in the government.

And those government officials are about as popular as holocaust deniers at a bah mitzvah. Franco apologism is literally illegal here.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

One side is gonna lose in the end. That is all that matters. The world is ruled with violence. Non-violence only is beneficial to those currently in power.

Basic self-preservation as you put it requires violence. How are you going to preserve yourself when you let people run around who want to opress or kill you?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One side is gonna lose in the end.

And there are plenty of times where this is done non violently.

Basic self-preservation as you put it requires violence.

Yes. As a last resort. That doesn't mean never using violence. It means using it for self preservation, not just because you disagree with them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As a last resort is too late. If you can use violence successfully, it justifies itself. Waiting for when it's time for the last resort is too late. You're not going to stop the nazis in the spring of 1933, you would have needed to kill them in the 20s, a decade before they came to power. The same applies to any political movement.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

You’re not going to stop the nazis in the spring of 1933, you would have needed to kill them in the 20s, a decade before they came to power.

Except such thinking was how we got the Nazis in the first place. Hitler co-opted unions and parties who were extremised by such responses, and these were the basis of the Nazi party.