this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2025
61 points (96.9% liked)
Slop.
520 readers
369 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
why 76.6 why not just tell it to be infinitely more smart
Me when I tell ChatGPT to roleplay as an AI that's very good at math and then solve every Millenium Prize problem (I am going to win 6 million dollars)
This might be the dumbest part of the whole thing. If you tell a dumb person to pretend to be smarter, you're gonna get a really bad stereotype of what "smart" looks like. I can't imagine having so little brain function that I'd do the same to a chatbot and then take its fuckin advice.
This is also why "SMART" characters in movies are often just really dumb but with nerdy/asshole characteristics. Because it is hard to write a character that is smarter than you are. The only real way is to research the topic at hand and learn from and listen to experts on that topic, so you can write a convincing smart scientist character by referring to actual experts in the field. But that's hard. Much easier to just write a character who says a bunch of technobabble nonsense and then acts like an asshole when no one understands them, it's not like emotional intelligence and communication skills are a sign of being smart or anything like that, gotta push a bunch of anti-intellectualism into everything.