this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
223 points (92.1% liked)

Technology

70302 readers
2854 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
223
Why 3D-Printing an Untraceable Ghost Gun Is Easier Than Ever (Podcast 18mins) (www.wired.com)
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
73 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

On today’s episode of Uncanny Valley, we discuss how WIRED was able to legally 3D-print the same gun allegedly used by Luigi Mangione, and where US law stands on the technology.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

his gun

Is that a fact? Are you sure? Will you recant if it comes out that the police did, in fact, plant it?

Nitpick the lawyer's phrasing all you like; it won't actually change any of the facts of the case, whatever they may be. Myself, I'm not going to jump to "why bother having a trial? The police arrested him; he's clearly guilty as sin" based on a Lemmy comment!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 25 minutes ago* (last edited 24 minutes ago)

Is that a fact? Are you sure? Will you recant if it comes out that the police did, in fact, plant it?

Did you just take those 2 words completely out of the context in which they were written? You sure did! I said:

All they’re doing is drawing attention to the fact that it was his gun by not denying it was his and trying to get it excluded from evidence.

I'm saying that they're essentially confirming that the gun is his by this action. Learn to read.

Myself, I’m not going to jump to “why bother having a trial? The police arrested him; he’s clearly guilty as sin” based on a Lemmy comment!

Neither am I, nor am I saying anyone else should.