this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
201 points (94.3% liked)
Leopards Ate My Face
6586 readers
459 users here now
Rules:
- If you don't already have some understanding of what this is, try reading this post. Off-topic posts will be removed.
- Please use a high-quality source to explain why your post fits if you think it might not be common knowledge and isn't explained within the post itself.
- Links to articles should be high-quality sources – for example, not the Daily Mail, the New York Post, Newsweek, etc. For a rough idea, check out this list. If it's marked in red, it probably isn't allowed; if it's yellow, exercise caution.
- The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a comment removed, you're encouraged to appeal it.
- For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the comments.
- All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.
Also feel free to check out [email protected] (also active).
Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.
_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You literally said "voted for" then started being shitty about it. Also, you wishing death on people for no reason makes you an even shittier person.
It's not for no reason. They have a very legit reason.
There is no reason that's valid to wish for death for anyone. And no, "they like the other guy!" in politics isn't a valid reason.
Can’t tell if you’re naive or pedantic, probably a troll.
If you can’t imagine a valid reason to wish death on someone, you’re not qualified to converse on an adult level.
I don't remember asking. People are allowed to have different opinions. You don't have to agree.
Please apply a modicum of common sense.
I said “voted for”, but wait he can’t vote, my entire point is null and void! Unless of course you engage your higher brain functions and think “hmmm, we’re in the leopards ate my face lemmy, he probably means “supports”, since that makes sense with 0 additional thought, but I better argue semantics so the point is entirely lost”.
Please increase the amount of precision you use when communicating in text on line with people who may not speak the language natively that you are responding publicly to.
Do you want people to "have modicum of common sense" but don't want to exercise any modicum of responsibility.
It's fine if you just accept when someone points out your flaws like any good writer would do when an editor points out some really really really really basic edits.
I may be wrong, but it seems like you are throwing a temper tantrum because someone dared to correct a error you made.
Just fix it, thank them for helping you fix your argument, and move on feeling better about the effort you made.
Correct me all day long, you’re right I should be more specific and prefer to do so.
But don’t pretend my entire point is invalid because an unrelated point is inaccurate in a way that isn’t pertinent at all. It’s lazy internet trollery and it deserves to be called out when committed, as I did and will continue to do.
And we don’t have to assume that’s what they were doing, they straight up said it at some point here.
Exactly, your point is null and void because he couldn't have voted for Trump.
The very first part says “trump supporter”. Did you miss that or do you come from the “any error you make, no matter how unrelated, renders me the victor!” style of comedy internet arguing?