Technology

70248 readers

3516 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

199

Why Balcony Solar Panels Haven’t Taken Off in the US (www.wired.com)

submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

96 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I love how you address only 1/3 of the items I brought up!

You brought up losses and environmental impact. I addressed only losses.

Okay. "Environmental impact" is hard to quantify, but you could try and put a dollar figure on the cost of putting a solar panel in the desert. You should already be internalizing any costs, though, and that's not where companies are choosing to stick solar farms.

But there is value to putting production as close to load as possible.

Sure. It's just that having solar panels on balconies relative to solar farms in a desert is outweighed by the drawbacks, if your goal is cost-efficient generation (which as I pointed out in my original post, isn't always the primary concern).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

I brought up losses, upkeep, AND environmental impact.

All three of these items affect the cost of generation that you're ignoring.