this post was submitted on 18 May 2025
76 points (88.0% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1734 readers
199 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

They also wouldn't need to, because the West wouldn't give a shit about Gaza without Hamas activities to put Palestine in the news. There's a reason Hamas won that election in 2006.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

They also wouldn’t need to, because the West wouldn’t give a shit about Gaza without Hamas activities to put Palestine in the news.

... Gaza was a big fucking deal back when Fatah was in power, and it was when Fatah was at the head of things that the peace process came closest to becoming reality, with significant Western interest and support.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

... Gaza was a big fucking deal back when Fatah was in power

As a humanitarian disaster?

and it was when Fatah was at the head of things that the peace process came closest to becoming reality, with significant Western interest and support.

Before I respond, are you talking about the 2005-2007 period?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

As a humanitarian disaster?

Yes. Since the fucking 90s.

Before I respond, are you talking about the 2005-2007 period?

No, the 1990s, when it was one of the issues in US foreign policy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

No, the 1990s, when it was one of the issues in US foreign policy.

Oh, you're talking about that. In that case you should know that the period of the conflict where such a thing was possible ended when Rabin was assassinated and Netanyahu took his place. See: Literally his whole career, but most relevantly:

They asked me before the election if I'd honor [the Oslo Accords] […] I said I would, but ... I'm going to interpret the accords in such a way that would allow me to put an end to this galloping forward to the '67 borders. How did we do it? Nobody said what defined military zones were. Defined military zones are security zones; as far as I'm concerned, the entire Jordan Valley is a defined military zone. Go argue.

And, well, there's a reason they call him the king of Israeli politics and it's definitely not because his policies are unpopular. Both Fatah's Oslo-era strategy and the West's strategy at the time were just never going to work with people like that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

In that case you should know that the period of the conflict where such a thing was possible ended when Rabin was assassinated and Netanyahu took his place.

... okay? How does that affect the fact that, demonstrably, Western and US interest was very acute and intense long before Hamas was a major force in the matter?

This is, after all, what you said and I objected to:

They also wouldn’t need to, because the West wouldn’t give a shit about Gaza without Hamas activities to put Palestine in the news.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 minutes ago

Yeah fair enough I went on a weird tangent there. What I was trying to say was that the Western interest and support you were talking about was the kind that needed a good faith Israeli effort to amount to anything. There was no interest in forcing peace on Israel, is the point I was trying to make. That's why when Israel put its foot down and said "nope" pretty much everyone played along, as best exemplified by the absolute shitshow that was Western reaction to the 2006 Palestinian elections. The kind of abject horror that's now making four different heads of state say "we are not exporting weapons to Israel" (with varying degrees of truthfulness) to placate their populations simply wasn't there. So to respond to your point: Western governments and people did want to being peace to Palestine, but it was viewed as just another regional conflict, not as settler colonists ethnically cleansing an indigenous population with Western support, so they were just another participant in the farce.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure that was after 2006. Leading up to the 2006 elections Hamas highlighted the success of violent resistance in ejecting Israel from Gaza compared to the abject failure of peaceful resistance by Fatah. My point here is that despite their many flaws, they actually get things done, and their getting things done is a large part of why the Palestinian cause has gotten as far as it has.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I’m pretty sure that was after 2006.

Hamas has been receiving Israeli support since the late 80s when it was founded.

My point here is that despite their many flaws, they actually get things done,

What? Speeding up the genocide by being the Israeli right's perfect foil in this grotesque kayfabe?

and their getting things done is a large part of why the Palestinian cause has gotten as far as it has.

... Gaza is on the verge of total genocide, and the West Bank is looking to be next. Is that progress for the Palestinian cause?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Hamas has been receiving Israeli support since the late 80s when it was founded.

I just checked and yeah that's true fair enough.

What? Speeding up the genocide by being the Israeli right's perfect foil in this grotesque kayfabe?

Any effective (or not so effective) act of resistance was going to be met with massive Israeli reprisal, so the only way to not be a foil for the Israeli right is to literally do nothing. See: Fatah.

Is that progress for the Palestinian cause?

If somehow Gaza survives this it'll be very much a hotly debated "at what cost" kind of deal, because October 7th did start the countdown for the end of Israel's current existence, but at present no, because of course there need to be Palestinians before there's a Palestinian cause. That said that's not my point; I was responding to the idea that Hamas has been just a parasite passively profiting off Palestinians' suffering when in real life they've been an active contributer to the Palestinian cause while also profiting off Palestinians' suffering. Whether you like their contribution or not (prior to October 7th anyway) is one thing, but they are and were an active resistance organization without which prospects for peace in Palestine would be completely different. I mean there probably wouldn't be a genocide either, but again that's beside the point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Ultimately and unfortunately Hamas has enabled the Israeli goal of splitting the West Bank and Gaza in the concept of Palestine.

The West Bank may soon be the only place of Palestine left, neither because of nor in spite of Hamas.