this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
983 points (92.2% liked)
Bluesky
1163 readers
13 users here now
People skeeting stuff.
Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Pot, kettle.
https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/hillary-clinton/summary?cid=N00000019&cycle=CAREER
https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/summary?cycle=All&ind=Q05&recipdetail=S
What trump is doing is wrong also.
Where did I say it was right? I am just calling out the hypocrisy.
Clinton's charity confirms Qatar's $1 million gift while she was at State Department
She also received money (@ least a million) from Qatar while in office.
She failed to report it, admitted it after being called out. It was part of the ridiculous show that won him the election.
She's the worst person to open her mouth about this, as she's directly guilty and tried to hide it.
Not 400 million, but a direct comparison with Qatar can be made.
Ah, the Russian bots are working overtime today to distract the left from talking about trump again.
We don't really need to talk about Trump's corruption. We all know he's corrupt and none of us are arguing about it.
But when the person who was so corrupt she couldn't win an election against the orange buffoon starts inserting herself into the conversation, accounts like yours come out of the woodwork to defend her using stale 2016 rhetoric. If there are fake accounts here, I'm pretty sure it's yours.
Brother Russian bots are at least getting paid for it. You are in this thread "protecting" fucking Hillary of all people, with your life, FOR FREE. Who is the real idiot here?
Truly, there is nothing like sitting in midwest america in trump land and being called a russian bot. @[email protected] I realize a nuanced view is difficult for many.
Should I insult you before I finish replying?
Is posting a fact about the 2016 election, and Hillary Clinton somehow disinformation?
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2016/oct/16/mike-pence/did-qatar-promise-clinton-foundation-1-million-fiv/
My point was, that the turd is being a hypocrite, in that part of his campaign in 2016 was capitalizing on her errors in failing to report external country lobbying.
There's strong evidence to point to Hillary being wrong here and very much the orange turd. Two things can be true.
I'm not trying to what about the facts.
Someone posted a screenshot of her top contributors.
I recently watched a video discussing the jet, which played clips of him arguing against her doing the same thing he's defending. I looked into it and found https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/05/13/trump-plane-qatar-comments/
As I noted in my statement which you replied to - It's not exactly the same, but comparable.
If anyone wonders why I would even try, please be aware of this adage. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini%27s_law
seems the hillary stans can't respond to evidence
Seems accurate.
Nothing wrong with speaking from experience.
I would really appreciate this twisted timeline we're in featuring the Clintons openly acknowledging that they know how corruption works from experience as a way to derail the current corruption train that we're all tied down in front of. The writers need to demonstrate that they haven't completely lost the plot or I'm cancelling my subscription