this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
452 points (95.9% liked)
Greentext
6265 readers
1375 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
He is definitely on the hook for child support because the child deserves those benefits, and that's the way it should be.
Shared custody / co-parenting often reduces the raw financial burden, but the child still needs parenting and support, and if she's the only one putting in time, then under Capitalism, he has to put in money.
Also, in many states, if the child gets governmental benefits based on being in a low-income family, the state will often aggressively seek out the other parent, even if the primary parent doesn't really want to deal with them.
I'm not defending male rape, but I am defending taking care of all humans since none of us asked to be born. If the child (and everyone else) got UBI, there would be less (or no) reason for child support payments.