this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
396 points (98.3% liked)

News

29258 readers
3993 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

There could, in fact, not be the category of trans if there was no gender binary. Without the moon, no cis- and translunar orbits. A boundary has to exist before it is possible to cross it or, indeed, stay within it.

That boundary is a quite bit fuzzy because gender is a bimodal distribution: Two bell curves which meet in the middle. But it clearly is there, those two humps clearly exist, they may apply to no individual but they apply, statistically, to the population as a whole, and as we're individuals and not statistics where shit gets stupid is when people are saying "you're on that side of the graph in aspect X, therefore you must be on the same side in aspect Y": It's trying to enforce a strict boundary when things are, well, fuzzy. Multi-dimensional, at the very least. There's women with beards and men who can give birth. There always have been, and if that scares you then you should learn to live and let live.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

"Trans" means people who are one sex who think they are the other, or think they are a "gender" different to what their sex determined gender is. That's fine, they can identify themselves however they want in terms of "gender identity".

Gender as it is now used is basically a "feeling". It's not scientific. It's not based on science or biology or anything tangible. It's literally just feelings. This is why there should not be any laws based on "gender", but instead all based on sex - when anyone can change their gender at any time, basing anything on gender is completely pointless.

Sex is not "fuzzy". There are 2 sexes, male and female. 2 gametes. 2 chromosomes. These "men" who can give birth are females/women who "identify" as the gender of "man".

For the bearded women, facial hair doesn't determine sex.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Sex is not “fuzzy”. There are 2 sexes, male and female. 2 gametes. 2 chromosomes.

That's not even covering karyotypes, much less phenotypes. Read up on the actual biology before making BS claims like that.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Dunno if you deleted your comment or what but I have the notification for it so I’ll reply to this one:

XXY karotypes exist, sure - that would be a male with a DSD. All DSDs affect either a male or a female. They are disorders that affect one or both sexes, not different sexes.

Phenotypes are whole irrelevant. They’re just observable traits , like height or eye colour. There are no “female sex determining phenotypes”.

It all is very complex, but the number of sexes isn’t - male and female are all there is.

Also you used a fungus as an example of 20k sexes? This is incorrect. There are “20k” mating types, not sexes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago

I didn't delete anything, your instance must be slow federating.

There are no “female sex determining phenotypes”.

Having the one or other set of reproductive organs, or something in between, is a phenotype. Phenotypes are the result of genes interacting with the environment, and your genitals are, indeed, a result of that. All of you is a result of that (because you don't have any of your original cells any more).

In any case so you do seem to acknowledge complexity. Sexes, btw, as you describe them, are precisely "mating types", I mean you started out with gametes. As to the choice of organism: You baited me, you said "creature on earth". Fungi, last I checked, fit that category. Andorians have four sexes, btw.

Given that you accept all that complexity, why not the possibility of mind and body not matching up, making affected people have a rather intense desire to live their life as the gender opposite their overt phenotype?

What about the absolute deluge of studies that show that that, indeed, is a thing that happens? Why even argue this, when the science is settled? What's in it for you?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

There are 2 sexes, factually. If you can show a third that has ever existed in any creature on earth you would win a Nobel prize.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Schizophyllum commune has over 20k sexes.

As to humans: You could have googled karyotype and understood that there's things like XXY, you could have googled phenotype and understood that you can have a XY karyotype and still a female phenotype.

This is all massively more complex and diverse than you think it is I've not even scratched the tip of the iceberg here.