this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
884 points (98.8% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6506 readers
459 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
884
The Myth of Plastic Recycling. (slrpnk.net)
submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
112 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Counterpoint, how much is cancer treatment for (research sounds, papers rustling)... Seven thousand people†?

Multiply that by... some studies show costs of cancer treatment as high as $173,831 annually. 1,216,817,000? Would it cost more than 1.2 billion dollars a year to stop making everything out of plastic? This is just like, napkin ass math I'm not pretending to be a huge know it all or anything by the way. Personally I think that yes, we should stop making things out of poison, even if it costs more money.

†A recent study estimated that PFAS contamination in drinking water contributes to more than 6,800 cancer cases each year in the United States.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

I don't disagree with you at all, but I just don't see a way for it to happen in the current corpo-controlled climate.