this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
20 points (85.7% liked)

Public Health

633 readers
62 users here now

For issues concerning:


🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link ([email protected])


Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The results echo a 2022 study from the U.K., which found that among participants aged 40 to 69, those who reported smoking cannabis were more likely to have a heart attack compared with non-users.

--buried amongst the fluff in the article

Smoking.
Which was far more prevalent (99.9%?) pre-legalization.
Vaping and ingesting cannabis are far more common now.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

I haven't forgotten the time the UK gov ordered a cannabis study and then deleted the results and tried to suppress them because it didn't like the conclusion.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good spotting. I read most of the article but missed this.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

To be fair, it's an 'ok' article, as it brings the topic to light, however it appears the self-reported cannabis use would be dominated by smokers given the relative 'newness' of alternative consumption methods.