this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
63 points (98.5% liked)

chat

8381 readers
273 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So I just finished my masters in CS and got a job as a junior software engineer. When I first chose CS for my bachelors, I did so because it was somewhat intuitive for me. But I wasn't crazy about it. Thought the interest would grow over time. I've had undiagnosed ADHD throughout my life and thought the difficulties with CS during my bachelor's (which took almost 7 years) was due to the ADHD and not due to lack of interest in the subject. Learned coping strategies and did my master's. Graduated with a 4.0 GPA so I'm not bad at it for sure.

Now I'm medicated and I finally feel like I'm able to be 100% of myself. But despite that, I still just do the tasks at work for the sake of doing it. I like the problem solving aspect but it isn't something I dream about every day. I see my mentor working in the same company live and breathe this stuff and I can tell there is a clear difference in the thought process between both of us. It's easy for him to produce great quality work as he's naturally curious about this stuff. Me, I just try to get it done. It's not lead by curiosity for me. What grabs my interest is stuff like literature, history, linguistics, philosophy, sociology, movies etc. I don't need any incentive for those things. I'm naturally curious about those fields.

Now I'm wondering if I should still stick with software engineering where I'm decently okay but not that curious about it . Or should I consider a career more aligned with the social sciences/humanities? I don't even know what careers are in those fields that would be comparable in terms of pay/growth to software engineering. Is the choice between money and passion or can I have both to some degree in the non-SWE fields?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

I think instead of asking: "how can I best position myself in the labor market individually" we should ask: "how can I best position myself to contribute to collective labor power". Actualize your individuality by joining the collective struggle of the 99% instead of generating profits for the 1%.

It's great, that you have an interest in social sciences and you could certainly try to turn that into a job. The fact, that you're willing to let go of the privilege, that comes with the software field honors you. It means you're not just after the money.

But what if, instead of comodifying your passion to turn it into tiny cog in a profit machine for some capitalist, you find a way to use it to help some worthy cause? Maybe write articles about social issues to agitate fellow workers or use your interest in social science to figure out how an effort to unionize workers in your field could be successful. Or join an org, that could use your talents in some way.

And there might be a worthy cause soon: As a software developer, you're in a field with unusually high wages despite almost no unionization. That's because it's organic composition of capital leans towards variable capital. The tools of the trade are cheap. Like a skilled artesian, a software developer can just take their laptop and walk, if their wage is too low. An engineer in a car factory might be just as skilled, but can't take the robots and assembly lines and walk out, their field has much more fixed capital. So labor in your field has high individual bargaining power, even without collective bargaining.

But like almost every technical innovation ever, AI will shift the organic composition of capital towards fixed capital. This could lower the bargaining power of workers. That's why they push it. For example, if huge server farms to drive closed source, centralized AI models become the norm, software engineers won't be able to just take those with them and walk out as easily as before. On the other hand, small, cheap, specialized, easy to train, open source models (like China develops) might actually benefit labor power. It will be necessary to fight for democratic control over AI to decide whether it's a blessing or a curse.

So if you're asking about how to position yourself in the labor market, I'd say, wether in the software field or in the humanities, try to find a place where collective labor power is strong and try to find the way you can best contribute to that power in your own unique way.

Link to the comic

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Wow, thank you so much for this. You've given me a lot to think about. It's something I hadn't given much thought but now see how important it is. Collective labor power with respect to SWEs seems like a challenge but one I'm not averse to exploring. Appreciate your words truly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

I would really recommend checking out CODE-CWA, they've been spearheading a lot of the unionization efforts in the tech field.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago

i was trying to find the words for this, but i think you hit it out of the park.