this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Science
3142 readers
1 users here now
General discussions about "science" itself
Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The key thing for me is whether all color distinctions visible to the animals are made visible to us by the simulations. Wavelength shifting can do that as long as the animals are trichromats. If they’re tetrachromats, it’s impossible in theory even with color shifting.
What you're saying is for sure true, but even if the wavelengths were a complete match we can't know if they're represented to the animals the same way they are to us. It could be something wildly different. If you think of trying to explain what colors are to someone who was blind from birth, it could be that same level of difference between us an animals - something impossible to envision.
That’s kind of the philosophical issue of qualia: we don’t know if I experience red the same way you do, even if our eyes are physiologically identical. The most we can say is that my red maps onto yours in a way that preserves distinctions of meaning, and I think that’s all they’re trying to do with these cameras.
I agree that's what they're trying to do, but the headline is a bit misleading. Even the people making the system aren't saying this is what it looks like to the animals.