this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
124 points (94.3% liked)
Asklemmy
47617 readers
898 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The natural extension of this is that everyone should live in one big megacity. Is this what you want?
No need to be so extreme. We still need village and middle sized city. But the dead zones ? I think it make no sense for the state to support a full service at the top of its fingers
Alternatively:
Government attempts an economic revival with incentive for young people to move to these places. Some will naturally take hold and flourish, others will not
Not perfect either, but gives the places a fair chance and leaves the outliers that can survive. Sometimes the burden of the old shit (not just people) can be too much and drag revival down as well, so it wouldn't be permanent megacities
Just spit balling off their idea
I mean, it would make travel a lot more convenient. As long as we need agricultural workers it's tricky to even consider, though.