this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
1399 points (99.3% liked)

memes

14224 readers
4415 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Ok, it's a street scene in 2024, but everyone is poor, and as a result they don't have anything built after... say... 1995."

Aa someone from a country in which homelessness really isn't a thing, where people don't live on street, that those districts seem awfully similar to someone of the homeless encampments. Can't find the video now but someone compared that DS9 clip to a homeless encampment with people out of their mind on fentanyl.

Seemed pretty spot on

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's similar, but homeless encampments are a bit different. The main difference, IMO, is that they're much less permanent. In the DS9 clip it looked like people were not expecting to have to move any time soon.

In a real homeless encampment, the police often come by to harass people and kick them out. People need to be able to move quickly or they'll leave stuff behind, and it will get broken, thrown away or stolen.

The other difference is that homeless people have cell phones. They're not the latest models, they're not in great shape. But, it's really hard to exist in the modern world without one. In the DS9 clip they had no tech, probably because that was easier on the props department than trying to imagine tech that would be 20-years more advanced than what people had in 1995.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You didn't see any tech there doesn't mean they couldn't have had any.

Phone snatchers are so common in some cities that you'd be a fool to show you have any.

It's a permanent shantytown yes, and the US is strongly against them, I know.

But still, it's very spot on in the general sense. Because looking 30 years into the future in terms of all around direction and political development, it's really not that hard.

And it'd be much harder now than it was 30 years ago.