this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
502 points (99.4% liked)
Cyberstuck
862 readers
15 users here now
A place to post your Cybertruck fails! We're here to make fun of this hunk of shit and throw as much shade as we can to that garbage bag of a human elon.
No doxxing No slurs No racism And no fucking nazis!
founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ah, yes. Tesla makes the best non-Cybertruck products with the following features:
-Door cards that fall off when you slam the door too hard
-Non-automotive grade monitors presenting yellowing over time
-Disabling and removal of key industry standard sensors for higher levels of autonomy
-Trunk lids that leak water into your trunk when you open it
-Panel gaps more inconsistent that Ferrari, except Tesla made no effort to ensure alignment after the fact
-Putting common and safety features behind a screen with no fail safe
When the first Model S came out. It was rave reviews across the board. Breaking safety score records. Making electrical sexy. Even if it didn't have the finesse and durability of the incumbent brands.
The idea was they should've gone up from there, not down. And they've gone down by a lot.
That’s because the testing standards had not yet adapted to cars with such low center of gravity.
Or sedans that heavy. Because it's a multiple of vehicle weight, while the raw number is extremely high for a sedan of the time, the roof crush score is actually pretty mediocre even compared to a Golf from the same year, it's just so damn heavy the roof had to be stronger to even pass.