this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
605 points (99.0% liked)

News

28197 readers
4887 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What kind of Doctor? What kind of Visit?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Let's say the family type, and a checkup for any of the more mundane things above.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Typically, out of pocket no insurance cost for primary care physician visit is around $200-300.

If you know the doctor, maybe $100 if he or she does a sliding scale.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's encouraging, at least. It's not cheap per se, but definitely not as exorbitant as I assumed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

That is exorbitant for most people for a basic doctor's visit. Federal minimum wage is $7.25/hr. Takes an entire work week for a minimum wage worker to afford a doctor's visit.

As other's have explained to you, that is just a visit. It covers nothing else. No medication, no tests, no referrals. Just to talk to the Nurse Practitioner for 15 minutes. You will not be talking to the doctor.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Just brutal, I can't imagine losing my job and home because I got sick. It's been the case for many thousands of years typically, but it just seems so arbitrarily cruel to know that there's a better system that's been adapted (matter of opinion, I know), but strike it from consideration altogether because of the business model surrounding American healthcare. Paying higher taxes kind of sucks, but at least I've never had to remortgage for serious injuries.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

For most lower income Americans that can be cost prohibitive.

There are some lower cost options:

CVS and some other retailers have mini clinics where you see a nurse practitioner. Out of pocket these visits can be $50-100 out of pocket.

Some hospitals and health departments offer free clinics but they are often busy.

Online options have become more popular but they often are limited to very simple issues (e.g. sinus infections, allergies, etc).

This assumes you don't need a prescription or labs.

From a prescription standpoint, Walmart still offers $4 prescriptions for very common drugs. Again out of pocket.

Labs your sort of SOL.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

That does make sense, and although I guess it's good that there are ultra low-cost options available, there's that old adage about "getting what you pay for" to a certain extent.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well, that's the problem, due to changes passed with the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare), annual routine screenings are free including women wellness. A lot of people do not know this.

The problem is when they find something wrong. Going to a specialist can easily push from hundreds to thousands.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

To add on: it has to be coded correctly for insurance. A “yearly physical” is its own special thing which does not require a copay, and if coded correctly covers like a basic metabolic panel, lipid panel, maybe something less common if family history suggests it. It has to be billed as a “preventative service” for something on this list of what falls under the “free” stuff, if you don’t want a nasty bill. I know a full lab workup for me is billed at around $1600 before insurance, and a primary care visit would be around $300.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Interesting, it's no wonder that so many Americans have a difficult time with medical bills. I was also under the impression that the Affordable Care Act had been dismantled, it's a bit tough to catch all of the headlines with so much going on all the time.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Affordable Care Act is mostly still there, but

  • the tax penalty for choosing no coverage was struck down in court, so more people are making this choice
  • several states refused federal money to cover lower income
  • republicans re-opened the door to junk policies that don’t provide meaningful coverage

Also the current administration is trying to

  • replace support for state Medicaid programs with block grants that can be used to squeeze the state’s, who will reduce coverage
  • repeal important features of ACA, like no refusal of treatment for pre-existing conditions, 100% coverage of routine care including immunizations
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It's still counter-intuitive to me, the thought that any country/state would try to save money by rolling back coverage for immunizations. The total loss to GDP from chronic and acute health problems is nothing to shake a stick at, denying coverage for immunization is like a country shooting itself in the foot (assuming that they can cover the cost to begin with).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I don’t understand it either. Immunization has always been such a huge benefit, such a huge return on investment, such a huge positive, that I just don’t understand how even the most self-serving, manipulative liar with no morals would try to cut it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

So far as I can gather, it all comes down to vaccine hesitancy. The (dis)information coming down the line has led to some people calling themselves "Pure Bloods" in recognition of their common unvaccinated status, with the belief that there's some kind of high-handed conspiracy to monkey with people's DNA via immunization shots. It's a bit of a headfull, and makes for weird reading, but they've really dug their heels in about the issue, believing that their lives are on the line ironically enough. This is going to be one complicated ball of yarn to untangle...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Have you met Republicans? They like shooting themselves in the foot. They love guns.

And it is mostly the red states doing these counterintuitive measures. Unintended consequences going to catch up real fast.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

I've been hearing that for a while (and it was said for a long time before my time), but they're still keeping afloat somehow, despite several generations of getting railed by the conservative politicians, lawmakers & industry that they love. The math just doesn't check out, how long can people hang onto a ledge by their fingertips while cheering for someone who spits in their face?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

A lot of people think that it was gutted, but it's actually the reason we have a health insurance marketplace and why you can no longer get denied for preexisting conditions. Before it existed, you were just SOL.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affordable_Care_Act

Not that it's cheap, but my employer charges about the same rate for a high deductible plan. If you are low income, you can get cheaper plans.

Healthcare in America isn't that BAD if you are relatively healthy, but it is nearly impossible to navigate... by design. Now, if you are actually sick, YMMV.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Damn, good to know that the bit about pre-existing conditions hasn't been struck down yet. I had to look up YMMV :(