891
Bill presented that would make disliking Trump grounds for an involuntary mental health hold
(www.revisor.mn.gov)
this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
891 points (98.5% liked)
politics
22015 readers
4311 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't really understand how that has anything to do with psychiatry and whether it works or not.
Do you want to know why we understand anything about how culture affects how our brains work? Science. Peer review. And yes, say it with me now: psychiatry.
SSRIs are some of the, if not the, most studied medications on the planet. They're not just improvising out there. You need to inform yourself about how all of this actually works before you try to make the kinds of claims and generalizations you are making.
I have tried SSRI's! not a fan! I'm sure there's a lot of science on the chemistry, and sure, that might be valid, but when it comes to what that chemistry DOES, the only people who are respected to assess that are psychiatrists, who I don't trust or respect as far as I can throw them. I genuinely do not trust any study with psychiatrists involved. I do not trust them to observe anything that does not confirm their power, and I do not trust them to accurately report observations that run counter to their interests. if it helps, I think scientologists are just as sus.
I don't really respect your position here, I think you're being dogmatic about science, which is fucking disrespectful to the ideas behind it, which both dulls your point substantially and loses much of my respect.
Surely you understand that, statistically, your anecdote is meaningless, right?
That's simply not true. Ever hear of pharmacology? Ever hear of double-blind studies? You really have no idea what you're talking about. And that's fine, but you have to recognize it and stop saying such ridiculous shit with so much confidence.
Being dogmatic about science? I'm literally just trying to explain the very basics of how the scientific method works because obviously you do not understand it.
What power?! What world do you live in??
I'm so fucking sick of this demonization of science and scientists. This is same as the "scientists are greedy and just want grant money" bullshit. Just completely misrepresenting the entire industry/community and discrediting everything that they do (which, by the way, you seem to have no issue with reaping the benefits of on a daily basis)... It's bizarre to be honest.
And the shit you are saying is straight out of Scientology, so I'm wondering if I was actually correct in my initial comment. Who needs SSRIs when you can just do an audit and get rid of those pesky thetans for $100,000?