this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
387 points (93.9% liked)

politics

22015 readers
4311 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yes there was still time to run a primary.

Besides, Biden should have dropped from the race many months prior, or better yet not run again at all as he promised during his 2020 campaign.

Harris and other DNC members shouldn’t have tried to gaslight us about Biden’s health during all that time; they really took us for a bunch of idiots, which most certainly didn’t help their case.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

No, there wasn't. A primary in 50 states takes roughly 6 months to run. They had ONE.

Biden bowed out July 21st.

The convention was scheduled to start August 19th.

30 days. You can't run a 50 state primary in 30 days. 1.66 primaries per day.

Moving the convention wasn't an option due to state deadlines for candidates.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

The mistake still lies with the Dems (including Harris) for having prepared for seemingly nothing that is happening despite them writing out in detail what they would do. They did not prepare a good candidate, just assumed that one would appear or that Biden would run. When Biden ran, and his numbers sucked, he didn't back out. That is all the fault of Dems.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

There's a lot of blame to go around, but nobody is going to tell a sitting President they can't run again. It was Biden's call and he ultimately made that call too late for any other candidate to have a successful run.

Once Harris was tapped, there's now evidence Biden hampered her campaign as well:

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5191087-harris-trump-biden-harris/

It's not "the dems" fault, it's Biden's fault. First, for not stepping down early enough for a proper primary, 2nd, for having a comatose debate performance, 3rd, for failing to recognize the economic pain the US public was going through, 4th, for claiming credit for policies that had no effect on the public at large, and 5th for insisting Harris not separate herself from his failed policies.

Someone should have sat him down and told him the economy sucks, people are hurting, and the policies you got passed haven't done anything yet. But he still stood up repeatedly and basically said "What's the matter, Jack? Economy is great!" while the public was "3% inflation on top of 3% inflation on top of 6% inflation in top of 9% inflation..."

That failure of recognition tanked his campaign and not allowing Harris to differentiate herself tanked hers.

She should have told him "No, your ideas are why you aren't in the race anymore, I'm doing something different." Instead she said, on live television, she couldn't think of anything she'd do differently. That's the point when she lost, nail in the coffin right there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Come on you can’t be this naive. Biden stepped down because dems made him, despite what you wrote,

What does it mean to not allow Harris to differentiate from his campaign? Or what? Harris made the choice to not differentiate from the Biden campaign. She’s an adult and an unpopular candidate who should own her mistakes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

If she wanted the candidacy, she had to stick with Biden. Read the article.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

No, she didn’t have to stick with Biden. She chose to. Again, what would have happened had she taken her distances from Biden after having secured the nomination?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Her entire campaign was Biden people and Biden money, she towed the line or lost that with no time to build her own support.

Remember: 30 days to the convention. 108 days to the election. Piss off Biden, lose all his people and all his money. Good luck with the election!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Which doesn't help when the staff and money gets pulled. I swear, it's like you do not have the first idea how politics works.

Biden was President, you go with what he says or you get cut loose with no time to rebuild on your own.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

After dropping from the race Biden no longer had control over the campaign funds.

Besides, even if we were to imagine that Biden could still hypothetically somehow take away the campaign funds, Harris still chose to play ball.