this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
171 points (100.0% liked)
Buy European
3527 readers
1976 users here now
Overview:
The community to discuss buying European goods and services.
Rules:
-
Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.
-
Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:
Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:
- No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia
- No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies
- No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users
- Do not share intentionally false or misleading information
- Do not spam or abuse network features.
- Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
Benefits of Buying Local:
local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.
Related Communities:
Buy Local:
Buying and Selling:
[email protected]
Boycott:
[email protected]
Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:
[email protected]
Banner credits: BYTEAlliance
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Why? Everyone else is doing it, and as they say, si vis pacem para bellum.
Thanks for quoting one of the most brutal and violent empires known for oppression and slavery on how to achieve peace.
The thought actually comes from Plato, the Latin is incidental because most people who could write in Europe in the past few millennia did so in Latin so most old adages survived in Latin.
That said, do you have an argument against the substance of what I said other than the language?
Any time Europeans and Americans got a lot of weapons to "defend themselves" they suddenly found a great place in the Middle-East to defend themselves onto a few years later
So does Russia and China. Yeah, it would be a nicer world if we all wouldn't start wars and stuff, but as you can see in the Russian invasion of Ukraine, that is not the case. Europe is currently militarily threatened by the US and Russia, so we either capitulate or do something about it.
By your logic though, Russia should disarm, and the only countries that could be trusted with weapons in the region are Ukraine, Poland and the Baltics, as IIRC they never had significant colonies, right? Zelensky had a proposal for Ukrainian peacekeepers across Europe, would you support that together with a demilitarized Russia?
Russia slightly but moreso in Africa. China does not so far. Ukraine is a poor example as Ukraine tried to join NATO against the promises NATO made with Russia.
Russia will not attack the EU as the EU has nukes. The only use for giant armies these days is to do imperialism with. China was cutting down on their army until the US went on a rampage again.
Sure as long as they only send foot soldiers and don't do stupid stuff like placing missile launchers on Russia's border. And they won't rob Ukraine of their minerals in exchange.
Fuck off. No they didn't, you piece of fascist shit.
Russia invaded, and then they said "We didn't try to join NATO because we promised not to, and Russia would leave us alone. Russia didn't keep up their end of the bargain."
Don't rewrite history.
Syria had Russian troops deployed, in the Middle East.
They own 78 ports in Africa over 32 African ports.
Ukraine asked for NATO after the Russian invasion, not before. All they wanted was EU trade agreements.
Russia is currently conducting a blatant and overt misinformation campaign aimed at toppling democrating governments all over the EU.
True I should have said MENA. Russia also tried taking Afghanistan but that did not go very well.
Are those military bases or simply ports? I remember China getting a big military port in Pakistan recently but they are certainly not present around the globe with their military.
Ukraine has started applying for NATO membership since around 2009? iirc. Which Ukraine is allowed to do. But NATO promised Russia Ukraine would not be joining NATO far before 2008. NATO then started applying Ukraine as a member which is when tensions started boiling.
Yeah fine but that is not a war. The US is also influencing and lobbying European politicians. And our amazing "ally in the middle east" is actively influencing many Western newspapers on a scale far greater than Russia.
2002, then abandoned it around 2008 to appease Russia. They did not pick it back up until after the invasion.
fuit pax quae nationes europae arma ferebant antea?
That is not even correct Latin.
Ok, I've checked it and wondering what your correction is?
I am sure I got all the endings correct, noun and verb.
Wouod you have used a different verb to 'fuit'?
I should have 'quando' in place of 'quae'
Google Translate is a helluva drug.
I didn't use google in years
I don't even get the point, there was no point in time of the history of Europe when its nations were not one of the major military powers of the world. So when was this beforetime when the "nations of Europe did not bear arms"? In the age of the Sumerian Empire?
Also, why don't I see the original reply in the thread? I know my instance is defed'ed from grad and hexbear, but this was someone from ml, right?
It's weird.
People have armed themselves throughout history, even if just to protect themselves from non-human predators.
As far as not seeing the original reply, I don't know enough about how it all works. I just know I like it here better than the r-place.
It doesn't folow from this that we should give right-wing imperial governments a trillion euro from social programs to go fight Arabs and Africans.
You've got to analyse each situation. You can't say, "There has been inequality throughout history, therefore we should cut taxes for the rich". You can't say, "There has been weapons throughout history, therefore we should cut social spending to give the UK a new aircraft carrier"