this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
25 points (100.0% liked)

Wisconsin Political News

50 readers
44 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Huh.

I has nothing at all to do with that.

In our current environment, I took "inseminated person" to be sort of a notably formal synonym for "cumdumps," or maybe less crudely, "sperm receptacles."

It seems to deny the individual so labeled of any human qualities aside from the fact that they've been, in conservative christian terms, blessed with a man's seed. The person described doesn't even seem to the important person in the description. It's more as if they're a mere receptacle, and the person who did the inseminating is the one who actually matters.

Self-evidently I should've read the article, but honestly it never struck me as even a possibility that such a dehumanizing phrase would actually be promoted as a progressive thing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah this is weird and creepy. What the hell was wrong with just making it a gender neutral "pregnant person?"

Instead he made it about the fucking semen.

Democrats just love fucking losing, fash media is going to have a field day.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The bill seems to do that, "Inseminated Person" is just one term that was cherry-picked to cause outrage by the people who only read headlines.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago

So just about everyone