News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
I would not suggest purchasing a gun if you are feeling cornered, vulnerable, and angry. Fear is the mind killer.
I would suggest reaching out to others, talking, getting political, and organizing.
I also wouldn't advise a gun. Explosives are way more effective.
Why stop there, surely there is something worse. Perhaps a personal nuclear weapon. Nothing too big of course, but just big enough to let's say make everyone regret having messed with you.
Think what a civil society would develop if everyone had one of these. On a side note, I am taking investments on a hot new uranium mine prospect.
My friend, if you nuke mar a Lago at the right time people will sing songs of your noble deeds for centuries to come.
What is the right time though. Would it be on a Friday for maximum shock or on a Monday so the news would have all week to discuss it.
And who are these people who would sing the praises. Most of all what did Mar a Lago do to deserve this. Maybe they hovered their finger over the "button" looking menacingly at you.
But yes, we all like noble deeds and to be known for centuries sounds great. Have you ever thought of opening up your own suicide bomber school.
When trump is home and preferably has musk round for tea.
Oof a big tech expo with Putin, Kim, and Poo bear. All of the mega billionaires all hanging with all the best of politicians. Is this the time?
I would much rather see all these people discredited and exposed for the liars and deceivers they are though.
Yeah but that's never going to happen in a system they've bought and paid for. Also, they have been exposed. Trump is a rapist and a convicted felon, musk is a nazi ket-head edgelord. But the problem is that nobody with any power will ever hold them accountable.
I know, it is pretty bizarre honestly. If I tried to pull the garbage they do I would be out of a job, arrested, and served divorce papers.
When diplomacy fails, you're left with two choices:
Violence or giving up.
Diplomacy is proving to be ineffective. That leaves only the two above options.
Tell that to India. I mean there are so many examples that prove you are full of shit it ain't funny.
Let's be real here. You just want people to be killed.
Oh yes, threats of violence is what our society needs. The immaturity of your mind is astonishing.
At any rate, Happy MLK Jr day!
You, and apparently the mods of this community, need to learn the difference between advocating violence for the sake of violence, and violence as a tool of survival and self defense when others are using violence against you when all options for peace have failed.
If someone is trying to kill you, are you just going to let them do it? You've tried talking to them and they're still going to kill you. What are you going to do?
We have a serious case of defense fantasy here boys. This guy has gone full someone is trying to kill them and the only way to stop it is to strap up and shoot them first.
Since everyone is going to be here it is best to spend your whole life practicing shooting so you can be the quickest draw and kill them first.
Or we could ya know, stop pretending that this is normal. Start regulating guns, get those yearly child deaths down to a reasonable number like zero.
Stop being cool with losing a million Americans in the last twenty years. Recognize that having more guns than people is unhealthy and that maybe we don't need to be a murderous society waiting to pull the trigger next time a stranger wanders by.
Not sure you realise how close you are to some serious trouble over there. I'm a left leaning European and I think you need to strap up. Genuinely you'll wish you had in a couple of years.
Hearing a supposed European tell someone who lives in a remote area in Alaska to strap up has to be one of the funniest things I have ever heard.
Guns are tools for the wilderness not solutions for equality. To think that there are so many people ready to murder for perceived differences is disturbing for sure.
What is equally disturbing it is estimated four million women in the US have been threatened by guns. Everyday millions of Americans live in fear and every year it costs us the equivalent of a major conflict in population.
It is truly a holocaust we commit against ourselves so gun executives make record profits and gunsexual enthusiasts can play out revenge fantasies in their heads.
Isn't it an American saying, that liberty is defended with 4 boxes? First the soapbox, then the ballot box, then the jury box and if those all fail, you still have the cartridge box. I agree that under normal circumstances guns should only be used as a tool for hunting. What I'm arguing is that these are far from normal circumstances.
Well you may be ready to start killing your fellow Americans, but not everyone else is. This highlights why gun control is so important. It is strange but true, but those who defend guns the most are the ones who probably should never own a gun.
I'm not American, unfortunately you fucking bible monkeys have dick-slapped your way into everyone else's business and now you all have to make it right. So make like a fucking grownup and fix your mistake. In Europe we have seen this shit before and I sincerely hope we wouldn't be so fucking stupid as to let it happen again. Fix your problems.
I will take that. I am extremely frustrated with our country which seems to be just one giant death cult at this point. I am sorry our country is fucking up the whole world. I will not stand here and lie to you about it though.
I'm sorry, my partner is one of you and trump is likely to sentence her mother to death. (Pre existing condition). We've been drinking heavily. I'm also not looking forward to when he decides to lift all sanctions on Russia and I have no break out the piano wire.
Bringing a good argument to a gunfight is unfortunately not a winning strategy. When the fascists have no qualms shooting you simply for being yourself, no amount of peaceful organizing is going to stop them. Peaceful protests and organizing only work because they have the implicit threat of violence if the demands are not met.
Yeah because that is what Martin Luther King Jr. would have wanted. We also have to ignore all the peaceful demonstrations throughout history to believe your line of reasoning.
I totally get you live in a fantasy world where moar guns are the only solution. I guess the good guys just magically kill the bad guys. Glad we got that all worked out.
Dr Martin Luther King Jr bought himself an arsenal. You may not have heard about that
"If the Negro succumbs to the temptation of using violence in his struggle for justice, unborn generations will be the recipients of a long and desolate night of bitterness, and his chief legacy to the future will be an endless rain of meaningless chaos."
I heard his words and understood the significance. You pretend he would support a literal genocide on the American people through gun violence. It is sickening really.
And black people have such a great time in the states today!
I will never forget traveling to the East Coast when I was a teenager and seeing that the other side of the train tracks wasn't just a saying. There were still restaurants blacks were not welcome at. The racism was palpable.
Would you like to investigate what the Black Panthers did? The number of times they shot their guns in anger is very small, but having guns was integral to their strategy of protecting the rights of black people being harassed by police. They were so effective that they changed to rules to prevent them from using guns the way they did. There were little more than 100 Black Panthers around at the time.
Perhaps you'd like to have a broader view of history beyond peaceful protests? Peaceful and violent means of protest rarely exist alone, and are rarely effective alone.
India would like a word. I have a very broad view. The difference is people don't always have to murder each other. In fact, murdering each other rarely brings about the kind a change we need in our society.
On today, the day we celebrate MLK Jr. maybe you could give peace a fucking chance. Tomorrow you can go back to being murderous gun nutter.
There were violent groups working for India's independence against the British.
Which brings me to this: https://cup.columbia.edu/book/why-civil-resistance-works/9780231156837
This book sometimes gets framed as "this proves non-violent protest is always better", but its text is far more nuanced than that. For any peaceful group that succeeds, you can find a more violent group working for the same goals. This is so consistent that making an academic case that peaceful protest works in isolation is an impossible task. For MLK, it was groups like the Black Panthers. For Gandhi, it was the Indian National Army.
Fascists would very much like it if you swallowed the idea that peaceful protest on its own is sufficient.
So if we come back tomorrow, do we get to argue without this shield around bad facts?
Yeah but most if not all of India was united against the British. They saw it as a potential military defeat if it did go sideways. The difference here is that Trump is wielding the government and zealous supporters against small marginalized groups of people.
If Britain decided to just murder people until everyone fell in line they would have had their asses kicked. If trump.does it he'd get it done pretty quickly.
This is a really interesting thought.
Thanks for proving my point with India despite the nuance. I mean you are really just arguing for violence at this point.
I get it, it is pre-emptive violence to prevent future violence!
Back to the argument that moar guns will solve the problem though. I get it now, more guns equals more violence and random Internet guy frezik likes violence!
Yeah, I don't think that proves your point at all.
No one attributes the success of the movement in freeing India with violence even if it did happen.
You are really reaching trying to prove violence has a purpose. And that purpose is apparently to get you off.
Nobody attributes it, except for people who have studied it beyond pop culture.
No, it is just you and your one Ghandi quote saying they were part of it. It is not a quote saying he would never had made it without their violence.
You really should stop pretending you know shit about this. I studied it in college and I don't feel like I could explain all the complexities of the groups interacting.
It is clear there have been many peaceful movements. Which leads us back to the concept that we need moar guns to solve our problem.
Did moar guns solve Ghandi's problems? Did moar guns solve Martin Luther King's problems? Don't bother answering because these are rhetorical questions.
Guns create problems, they don't solve them.