this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Not the Onion

2223 readers
15 users here now

For true stories that are so ridiculous, that you could have sworn it was an !theonion worthy story.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They really don't have a choice, they have to uphold the law as it is written.

They do, indeed. However, the "written law" includes the sixth amendment to the constitution, guaranteeing the accused the right to a jury. The flip side of that guarantee is that the juror is constitutionally empowered to reach a decision.

Constitutional powers supersede legislated law. The juror is not beholden to legislated law. Indeed, if they feel that strictly applying a lower law results in an injustice, they have a constitutionally-imposed duty to reject the short-sighted legislated law.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Right so what part of that would allow them to justify murder?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That question is nonsensical: 1. The jury never has to justify anything; 2. "Murder" is a legislated concept. The jury is not beholden to the legislature, and is free to reject the laws they create.

Where the jury feels that enforcing the legislated law would be an injustice, they are free to rule "not guilty", even if they believe the accused's actions violate that law.