this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
629 points (97.2% liked)

Science Memes

11808 readers
170 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But floating-point notation also can't precisely represent irrational numbers...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What superior method do you propose?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Symbolical computation is cool

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Following Pythagoreanism and believing irrational numbers to be blasphemous. They're represented by being struck down by the gods.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But some irrational numbers are only so in base 10

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Kinda. Technicaly no since an irrational number is a number that cannot be defined as a ratio of 2 existing rational numbers. Any number that can be represented in any rational base can by definition be represented as a ratio of somthing/base^n. This ignore the case of an irrational base but its practically useless cos any rational and most other irrational numbers will be irrational.

What u think ur trying to say is that some numbers cannot be represented in one base but can in another for example 1/3 can be represented as a decimal in base 3 but cannot jn base 10 ie u get 0.333(3 repeating forever).

Tieing back to floating point which uses base 2 u end up with simmillar issues with base10 base2 conversions hence most of the errors with floating point errors (yes at very large and very small numbers u lose accuracy but in practice most errors arise from base convention).

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What? That's not true at all...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

1 is always 1. It's $1 × b^0$ where b is the base.

10 is the base. $1 × b^1 + 0 × b^0$

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That doesn't make it rational but simply makes it writable in 2 digits(10)

Also you should have 3.1415... "number of characters" in that base... The base becoming irrational will make the number irrational

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

π = 10

in base 10, 10 = 10.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Even in base π, π is still considered an irrational number; using an irrational based doesn't change the fundamental identity of whole numbers or irrational numbers, it just changes the way we write them.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Writing the same number a different way does not make it rational. There are no two natural numbers p and q so that p/q = 1 base pi.