this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
1203 points (98.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

6024 readers
1417 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Why do you say the rats are better than us? Humans can be observed doing the same in similar circumstances.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's clearly not the point of the post.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The post title says exactly:

The rat bastards are better than us

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

It’s a sarcastic humor that even a rat is compassionate about others. We all know that humans do it too ( some people, at least ).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

I think is also shows the potential that empathy can be instinctual aswell as trained and reenforced

A rat may save another rat purely on instinct. Aswell as being able to be rewarded for either action and be influenced in the future to embrace a particular ethos

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

~~Some~~ Most humans. The notable (but not exclusive) exceptions being people who manage to become ultra-wealthy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Some

I disagree, from what I have seen, the vast majority of people are empathic, we just focus on those who are not

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

I agree. That should have said most, though some is still accurate but it sounds smaller.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

I do agree, but the thing that really defines your worldview is what you think the ratio of "good" to "bad" people are, along with how much you think people can change.

Personally, I think a lot of humans are largely interested in maintaining the status quo and avoiding large amounts of change. That doesn't necessarily mean that they're bad or evil or unredeemable, it just means that they're influenced by the systems that we've built and take comfort in what is known.

Be careful of diving too far into cynicism. Why would you try to change anything if you think it's impossible? Understand that the world is frustrating sometimes and give grace whenever you can when people make mistakes (as long as you make it clear when boundaries are crossed).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'm sure if you lock somebody in what used to be a filing cabinet or toolbox in a rich man's office and they start wimpering for help then the rich guy will get up and go let them out (unless he put them there).

Might even share his chocolate chips with them.