this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
937 points (99.6% liked)

People Twitter

5425 readers
1352 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Props to Klippenstein, he's consistently been an exemplar* of good journalism

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

True, but also consistently under fire for actually being a good journalist. If you're reading this keep up the good fight!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Kenny Klipps does great work, one of the very few last bastions of actual journalism remaining in America.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Props to Klippenstein, he's consistently been an examlar of good journalism

When David Grusch testified that UFOs are real, Klippenstein made a point of exposing that Grusch had past issues with PTSD and alcoholism stemming from his service.

Examlar indeed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

lol. You guys had me looking up "examlar" thinking I was going to learn a new word.

My hopes were dashed as I've discovered that you two just misspelled "exemplar". Probably on purpose. I'm sure of it. How dare you!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

You're truly an examlar of good spelling :P

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Whoops lol, not both of us just me. But yes, both entirely intentional and also daeviosly malicious 😈

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That seems relevant to me, a disinterested observer. 🤷‍♂️

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah, it really makes anything he does invalid. The same as it would for you or I.

Maybe I should also clarify: fuck business ghouls. I’m not here to defend health insurance.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's an important factor to consider when thinking about the credibility of his claims. That's what journalism is supposed to do, give people the facts. I get that discussing people's medical history and psychological condition is a sensitive subject, but when someone's making public claims and accusations in front of congress about delusional stuff like "non-human spacecraft" and their dead pilots that level of scrutiny is justified.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 weeks ago

Why do you assume it’s delusional?