this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
1989 points (99.5% liked)

People Twitter

5220 readers
1844 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
1989
Stuck in the middle with you (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
300 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

TL;DR? Why not just go watch another five second video of a kitten with its head in a toilet roll, or a 140 character description of a meal your friend just stuffed in their mouth. "nom nom". This blog post is not for you.

wow, this some next level obnoxious boomer shit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

The definition of cringe, gramps needs 70ccs of sensory content, stat

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

If you are offended by this, then you obviously didn't read the article.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Is it incorrect?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

In the sense that I don't believe the people described exist in any significant quantity, yes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

there is no statement there so I don't know what you mean by "incorrect". all i see is someone who doesn't know how people use tldr.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Was it too long for you and you didn't read it?

In that case ....This blog post is not for you.

That's what the question mark does. It marks a question.

RTFA? RTFA!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

I didn't read it because the tldr is retarded.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Or someone who knows very well people use tldr to skip reading the post and you are annoyed that he caught you being that lazy.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

valuing my time isn't lazy. if you can't summarize your post you're probably shit at writing and the article is not worth the time in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

not trying to be combative, but this grumpy response over a 5min read does illustrate something and i hope its trolling tbh. the tldr summary that is triggering here is kinda a key point of the article - people looking for a quick interaction and then moving on.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago

this is what i mean by shit at writing.

this fails to be the point of the article unless the article is suggesting people are moving on to quick interactions because they are deliberately being moved away from longer articles by the authors that suggest these articles aren't worth their time... is the point of the article that longer content is belligerent and condescending?

I don't think it's actually getting any point across. it's just a boomer who thinks no one has anything better to do.