this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
333 points (95.1% liked)

You Should Know

33447 readers
1383 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"The body mass index has long been criticized as a flawed indicator of health. A replacement has been gaining support: the body roundness index." Article unfortunately doesn't give the freaking formula for chrissakes; it's "364.2 − 365.5 × √(1 − [waist circumference in centimeters / 2π]2 / [0.5 × height in centimeters]2), according to the formula developed by Thomas et al.10"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's incorrect, it claims my body fat is 19% when I know for an absolute fact it's 22%.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Much better estimate than BMI innit?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think interestingly enough it's inaccurate in the other direction. While BMI is will call people unhealthy if they have a lot of muscles, this will call people healthy if they are like me severely underweight.

My roundness index claims it's in the healthy zone while in reality my weight is unhealthy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How do you know you’re unhealthy?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm currently receiving treatment for onset osteoporosis caused by malnutrition. Also it's kinda obvious your weight is probably not healthy when your ribs are sticking out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

looking it up, BRI ranges from 1 to 16, but somehow there isn't an accepted definition of underweight

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Thank-you.

I'm from the UK and grew up in the seventies. I can't do metric or imperial without help!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

This is giving me body fat percentages that are around double what I get from other methods. Not sure what's up, but I don't really believe my 5'8" 150lb ass is 30% body fat

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We're the same height and weight and I got 22%. No. Way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

That's normal.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Height selection on metric side has jumps of up to 3 centimeters lmao. Makes me doubtful about the accuracy since I've never before seen that

I'm also pretty skinny and it says my BMI and body fat is great but that I'm too round. I don't even have belly and it is showing me as quite rotund lol. I think there's something fucky going on with my measurements or about inputting metric into the calculator.

E: Tried it again and now I'm out of healthy zone for being too lean. Hmm. I'm not sure if I measured wrong or they're saying I should have a bit of a belly. Which is the sort of medical advice I actually want lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The wikipedia page has a calculator that supports metric more properly

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Height selection on metric side has jumps of up to 3 centimeters lmao.

Too lazy to look, but given 1 inch = 2.54 cm, my guess is the tool is written in inches, and just rounds those values to the nearest whole cm, thus alternating between 2 & 3 cm increments.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Don't Americans deal with differences smaller than 1 inch when it comes to height, is it just 2 footies 7 incherinos? I'm so used to it being per cm.

Tbh I've never before seen a dropdown selector for height before either. It's always just fill in thing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Maybe to a half inch, but it's not super popular (except for kids who ALWAYS are proud of that half inch they grew in x period of time). At least, that was the case before I moved to the sanity of metricland.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They don't. At most just 1/4 inch sometimes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Partial inches are only used by people insecure about their height. "I'm 5'7.25" ", naw bud, you're 5'7".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I was thinking that this was a bit like with age. Someone telling you online that they're "25 and a half", yeah I bet you are lol.

But to me 3cm difference especially in this sort of calculations just seems surprisingly big.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

In imperial, it's in one-inch increments, which is typical. Must have been written in inches and translated for the rest of the world.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

How come there's a metric button that doesn't work?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

It "works" for me, but if you want to put in xxx in CM, it might not be there because they stick to inches and you need to round up/down :/ For example, it goes 170cm to 173cm

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Drag tried on mobile and PC. Every time drag clicked metric, it reloaded and switched back to imperial.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why are you referring to yourself in the third person?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Drag isn't referring to dragself in the third person. Drag is using drag's first person neopronouns.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As a separate person, Drag is not Dragonfucker but concurs that Drag pronouns make Drag sound very cool, and Drag would like to adopt Drag's neopronouns for Dragself as well.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Awesome, drag is glad Drag likes them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Hmm, that puts me at BRI of 2.1, and BMI of 35.4

Those both seem incredibly off.

But I do have extra dense bones apparently, which tends to be mostly what screws with my BMI, and my ability to float/swim. But they seem really hard to break, not that I try very hard... but none of them have broken yet. And I've been in situations that seem like they should have broken.

Either way, I weigh alot more than I look like I should, not quite "Wolverine getting on a motorbike", but a bit like that.

Kinda makes me wish those "guess your weight" carnival experts were something I could see in real life, only ever seen it on TV.