this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Bicycling

2798 readers
11 users here now

A community for those who enjoy bicycling for any reason— utility, recreation, sport, or whatever!

Post your questions, experiences, knowledge, pictures, news, links, and (civil) rants.

Rules (to be added on an as-needed basis)

  1. Comments and posts should be respectful and productive.
  2. No ads or commercial spam, including linking to your own monetized content.
  3. Linked content should be as unburdened by ads and trackers as possible.

Welcome!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If safety equipment was mandatory at the pro level like it is on MTB, everyone would have that added increase. More research and development would go into lighter, breathable, rip proof fabric and lightweight, aerodynamic hard protection. Sure, time would go down, but I don’t see why you should sacrifice safety and health for a few seconds off your times.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

If safety equipment was mandatory at the pro level like it is on MTB, everyone would have that added increase.

I do agree. More equipment = fewer people getting into the sport. And if you do it for road, then you have to do it for gravel races...

It's a tough call. I guess if a large number of pros want it, then it should be done.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The downside to time cost is nobody will every break the records of old. (though we also know that in the past drugs, blood doping, and other things that are not allowed was done so breaking records may not be possible anyway)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Na there will be a beast in 15 years that'll come out of nowhere to smash it with pads on and set a new standard.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

(Now is “the past” of tomorrow 😉)