this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
62 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5742 readers
1925 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I thought the idea was that Republicans are actively working on destroying what has been working fine and is benefitting lots of people, not just on preventing more progress.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

As if Democrats don't do the exact same thing in lock step. Interesting where your focus lies however. It's helpful though because it indicates your bias.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The ignorance you're showing here is absolutely astounding. Banning things and removing certain people's rights is a defining part of US republican politics. Every damn week, there's a new thing they've decided is evil and needs to be banned. That's very much not the case with US democrat politics. Sure, there are things they too want to ban or change, but it's based on logic and not a constant stream of new things.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago

Yes, thankfully the Democrats aren't the party of trying to ban stuff. Imagine if they were, and came out of nowhere to like ban gas stoves, gas cars, freedom of medical choices, and gender affirming surgery for kids. If any of that was true then I'd have a pretty good point, but thankfully it isn't. Right?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Are you referring to something specific?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Abortion rights, voting rights, gay marriage, privacy, trans rights, immigration, housing, the economy, net neutrality, take your pick.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

The topic at hand is wheelchair accessibility, though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN1C022I/

Tldr, they're actually trying and have been trying, to pass bills to gut the ADA because disability access is anti American.

Also, the post is just making fun of the US consistently doing messed up stuff. When picking something for hyperbole, you usually pick something that's extreme, not something that actually already happened.
it's not quite as funny to say "the news is always like: former US president argues he should legally be able to do whatever he wants without consequences and courts might let him, meanwhile Finland has nearly eradicated homelessness." You do get that the point was to be funny?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

That proposal died in Congress 7 years ago.

We Americans are not the monstrous caricatures you make us out to be. We're not evil. We're not wicked. And the US is not some dystopian nightmare. It's actually a pretty good place to live.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The proposal shouldn't have existed in the first place! There wouldn't be a need to kill the proposal if our representation was composed of empathetic decent people, instead of ghouls bought out by the wealthy few.

It's pretty monstrous to even consider proposing a removal of legislation that objectively helps a lot of Americans.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Therefore, all Americans are evil. Got it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Nope, you're either just a moron with shit reading comprehension skills, or you're a sealioning troll.

I never said anything about all Americans, I said a portion of our representatives have proposed gutting ADA protections, which is pretty universally liked in America.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Nope. The topic at hand is free ice-ceam. A topic that you, as a rational adult, can understand that is 100% literal and not at hyperbolic example to make a point about general trends and not a single specific item.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

A topic that you, as a rational adult, can understand

Massive assumption tbqh

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Then somehow I'm in the wrong thread.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Yes the willfully oblivious thread is elsewhere

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not specifically. They just picked a random idea out of a hat. One that is currently working fine with no issue. To signify that is the type of stuff they go after.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Which takes us back to my first comment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Are you suggesting that Finland is offering free ice cream?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just in case you're sincerely confused, no I'm not suggesting that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Let me break down the original post for you, since you're refusing to understand it for some reason. Free ice cream is a ridiculous thing that would never happen, but would be amazing if it did, and countries like Finland seem to often be in the news for doing amazing things. Banning wheelchair ramps is a ridiculous thing that would never happen, but would be terrible if it did, and the USA seems to often be in the news for doing terrible things. You understand the meaning of a hyperbole - you're just being obtuse.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So, what does this OP actually mean?

That Americans are evil people? That America is a terrible place? That nothing America does is ever good?

You're making this out to be some kind of deep constructive criticism. So that's the part I need explained.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's saying that it's really bad that America has fallen so far lately.

Abortion rights are gone, voting rights are being messed with, a racist misogynistic president has a significant chance of winning the next election, gay rights are in peril. America isn't bad, but it's actively getting worse, so when a news article comes about about it, it's generally noting that downward trend. The news specifically talks about changes in things, not their current state. It also talks about big-ticket items, so smaller good things that happen don't get on the news when there's a bigger bad one going on. And there are a lot of big bad ones going on right now.

Americans aren't America. I'm an American, and I staunchly oppose just about all major changes that have happened to my country in the last decade. I understand that I am not my country, and the actions of my country are not my own. I love my country in the same way that I love my drug addict cousin; he makes me very uncomfortable and embarrassed right now, but I really hope he comes around eventually, because I have great memories of who he used to be. I'm doing my best to help him change, but it's not been enough.

The constructive criticism is that America should try to be less of a country where someone expects to hear bad news, and more of a country where someone expects to hear good news.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

constructive criticism

...would be welcome. As I said originally, of all the things you can criticize the US for, wheelchair accessibility isn't one of them. And it's not likely to become one of them any time soon.

My objection is that OP is not constructive. It could have been--plenty to criticize as I said--but it's not. At best it's ignorant; at worst it's vindictive.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's not criticizing disability rights. They way hyperboles work is that they need to be over the top. If you want to use a hyperbole for terrible news about America, you need something terrible that specifically wouldn't happen, even in America right now. That's why they used disability rights - because they're NOT in danger. If they had said something like "America revokes gay rights" it wouldn't be a hyperbole, because that's a real risk at the moment.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It’s not criticizing disability rights.

I know. It's criticizing Americans.

That’s why they used disability rights - because they’re NOT in danger.

Might want to check with some of the other lovely commenters on that one. I'm told that it's an imminent danger.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Again, Americans aren't America. It's criticizing the actions of the governmental body, not your average person who has no more control over that government than any of his 300,000,000+ constituents. And honestly, while there are many bigger issues on the table, I wouldn't be terribly surprised if the president who has shown complete disdain for the disabled decided to go after their rights as well. But for now there's bigger fish to fry.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

It's just a troll.