this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
1014 points (97.5% liked)

memes

10190 readers
2320 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (9 children)

I find "LEGOs" very upsetting.

Lego is not an acronym. It does not usually get all-caps in prose, though the all-caps logotype is sometimes imitated in text.

Lego is a proper name, and is also used as a collective noun. It does not get pluralized.

"You can't play with Lego anymore."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

In my word, you put Lego Men in your Lego creations. No LEGOs, no minifigs [the Lego Men that are female are Lady Lego Men], and no sets.

The whole 'you make the rules' aspect of the toy has been lost in a dozen licensing agreements.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Lego deez nuts ha gottem

Hmm. Sorry bout that. What were we talking about?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Lmao Legos adults

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Language is flexible. Deal with it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

You called down the ire of practitioners of the dark arts known as prescriptivism.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

fuck that. Lego is a company and I don't need it to tell me how I can and cannot use their name. if they don't like it they can suck my dick.

I really don't understand why there are so many people passionate about how to "properly" use The Trademark™ in The Way that was Sanctioned by The Corporation®

just play with your Legos and get over it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Brought to you by the folks behind "Get Off That Nintendo and Go Outside" while you were PC gaming. Lol :p

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I really don’t understand why there are so many people passionate about how to “properly” use The Trademark™ in The Way that was Sanctioned by The Corporation®

Actually, they are advocating against using it how the Lego company does. The Lego company uses LEGO in all caps.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm pretty sure the reason Lego isn't supposed to be used is because they don't want the trademark to be genericized. the all caps thing is stylization, I doubt they give a shit if you type it all caps or not.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I assume the people are passionate about grammar, and their corrections have nothing to do with respecting trademarks.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Legos is grammatically correct.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, that's Lego. Legos is a large metropolitan city in southwestern Nigeria.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

no, that's Lagos. Legos is a principle of rhetoric along with pathos and ethos.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which should be your original comment instead of the trademark thing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

no, I don't care if it's grammatically correct.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Great, doesn't change the fact nobody is passionate about protecting trademarks as you are saying.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yes they are, because the word Legos has nothing to do with grammar

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So what? Them being wrong about grammar doesn't change the fact they are speaking about grammar.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

no they aren't. they're talking about a trademark.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, about the grammar of a word that happens to be a trademark.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

you're being purposely obtuse

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Go ahead and continue pretending grammar nazis have a secret agenda of white knighting for corporations then.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

no one made a general argument about grammar nazis so far but here you go: grammar nazis are a different kind of wrong and dumb, but this is not about that. if it was, I'd be making fun of them for that reason. you're engaging in strawman arguments now, you might as well just quit because you clearly have nothing here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

no one made a general argument about grammar nazis so far

I did, I said generally their motivation is not concern for trademarks. It was in fact my first comment here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I obviously mean no one you're arguing against. grammar nazis have no relevance to this entire conversation. except the one you're having with yourself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

grammar nazis have no relevance to this entire conversatior

Your replies to my comment are off topic then, because that's what my talking about.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

wdym, you replied my comment. your comments are off topic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

that's even worse! especially because the vast majority of self proclaimed "grammar nazis" (really weird fucking title, guys) don't know shit about linguistics as a science

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

LEGO is too an acronym. it stands for Leg Godt, Danish for "play well"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That's...not an acronym. That'd just be LG.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It's an abbreviation.

Not all abbreviations are acronyms, only the ones that take the first letter from each word. Lego takes two letters from each word, so it's not an acronym.

On a similar note, some but not all acronyms are initialisms, if they're spoken as the letters rather than the "word" they create.

FYI, DIY, PS are all initialisms, and also acronyms, and also abbreviations. ASAP, SCUBA, and LASER are acronyms and abbreviations, but not initialisms. Lego, appt, and st are all abbreviations but neither acronyms nor initialisms.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I always thought acronym is a subset of initialism, not the other way around.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

That's a really good breakdown of the differences!

Now if you'll excuse me I have a few Ell-Ee-Gee-Oh sets to put together. :p

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

why is english like this... we just call it "shortening".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why does a language have different words for different concepts?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

in my language we tend to use base words to broadly describe concepts, and combinations of words for more accuracy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I think the "correct" usage of acronym is only when it is spoken as a word. But language evolves and all that.

You can see the tension in the way MW defines it (including the extended description). Like: here's the definition of the word, but some people use it when they actually mean initialism. This is in contrast to your more concise and cohesive definition of "[abbreviations] that take the first letter from each word". https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/acronym

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

It's actually an angry shout

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago