omg Toad, you can't just ask people why they're purple!
RustyEarthfire
The short answer is being admitted by the bar; we already trust them to certify humans.
If for some reason I were arbiter, I would say a convincing record of doing actual legal work, vetted by existing lawyers. The legal profession already has a well-defined model of how non-lawyers can contribute to the work, so there is no need for a quantum leap up to being a lawyer.
- The bar exam is just one part of a larger set of qualifications
- The bar exam is just a (closed-book) proxy for the actual skills and knowledge being tested. While a reasonable proxy for humans, it is a poor proxy for computers
It has a watermark explicitly saying it's a colorization. The embossed faux cursive is pretty hard to make out, but it is https://www.jecinci.com/
Is this p-hacking?
"Journal", "it's", and "because" are all mispelled in the original.
Nah, that's another cut up with very little of the interview
If there was a government-mandated monopoly on coffee and it was sold in L/s, we probably would.
Surprised not to see any posts referencing the Arbitrary List of Popular Lights or [email protected].
One of the requirements to make it on the list is:
A user interface where a single click turns the light on in a reasonable mode, and another single click turns it off.
I absolutely understand the anger at the Democratic party. I mention several useful activities to work toward fixing its many failings. The Republican party is strictly worse. Giving equal support to both is counterproductive.
Sisyphean Effort is actually a thing