this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1490 readers
18 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's not a protected title. Go to town with it.

But it's diluting the value of it if you carry no talent but want all the recognition.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

So the value of art is directly tied to talent in your opinion?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What's next, value of products being directly tied to their quality??

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What're you defining 'value'? Monetary, sure but what of emotional value? What're you defining as 'quality'? What's high quality art to you? What's valuable in your view? I garuntee that's not the same for everyone.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

True J. Benzo Peterson vibes

What do you mean by VALUE? What do you mean by QUALITY? What do you mean by PRODUCTS?? What do you mean by WHAT???

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Very true, since it's all relative no one should ever make an aesthetic judgement. No one should have thoughts about the value of art. No one should have any reaction to art other than an acknowledgement of its existence.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Tbf it’s more about their necessity than quality.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

No, the value of art is specific to each individual. A picture made by someone with no talent can be of enormous value to someone because of what it means, the relationship they have with the creator, the emotions it makes them feel etc.

Tieing value to talent suggests that a picture by someone who has trained for 5 years is somehow more 'valuable' than a picture by someone who has only trained for 4. Why? What metric is being used to determine 'value'? What metric determines 'talent'? Art is entirely subjective. To try and define it's value is missing the point, because it means something different to everyone.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

What are you doing, bro

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

@YungOnions

What do you mean value?

Emotional value? No. Many parents value their small child's drawings.

Market value? Mostly yes. Especially in commercial art like art commissioned for book covers. Untalented artists aren't going to be very successful.