this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
803 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

72484 readers
3499 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Less broadly useful than 20 tons of mixed texture human shit, and more ecologically devastatimg.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Are you just trolling or do you seriously not understand how something which can do a task correctly with 30% reliability can be made useful if the result can be automatically verified.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Its not a magical 30%, factors apply. It's not even a mind that thinks and just isnt very good.

This isnt like a magical dice that gives you truth on a 5 or a 6, and lies on 1,2,3,7, and for.

This is a (very complicated very large) language or other data graph that programmatically identifies an average. 30% of the time-according to one potempkin-ass demonstration. Which means the more possible that is, the easier it is to either use a simpler cheaper tool that will give you a better more reliable answer much faster.

And 20 tons of human shit has uses! If you know its providence, there's all sorts of population level public health surveillance you can do to get ahead of disease trends! Its also got some good agricultural stuff in it-phosphorous and stuff, if you can extract it.

Stop. Just please fucking stop glazing these NERVE-ass fascist shit-goblins.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I think everyone in the universe is aware of how LLMs work by now, you don't need to explain it to someone just because they think LLMs are more useful than you do.

IDK what you mean by glazing but if by "glaze" you mean "understanding the potential threat of AI to society instead of hiding under a rock and pretending it's as useless as a plastic radio," then no, I won't stop.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 59 minutes ago) (2 children)

It's absolutely dangerous but it doesnt have to work even a little to do damage; hell, it already has. Your thing just makes it sound much more capable than it is. And it is not.

Also, it's not AI.

Edit: and in a comment replying to this one, one of your fellow fanboys proved

everyone knows how they work

Wrong

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 hours ago

the industrial revolution could be seen as dangerous, yet it brought the highest standard of living increase in centuries

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

No, it matters. Youre pushing the lie they want pushed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Hitler liked to paint, doesn't make painting wrong. The fact that big tech is pushing AI isn't evidence against the utility of AI.

That common parlance is to call machine learning "AI" these days doesn't matter to me in the slightest. Do you have a definition of "intelligence"? Do you object when pathfinding is called AI? Or STRIPS? Or bots in a video game? Dare I say it, the main difference between those AIs and LLMs is their generality -- so why not just call it GAI at this point tbh. This is a question of semantics so it really doesn't matter to the deeper question. Doesn't matter if you call it AI or not, LLMs work the same way either way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Semantics, of course, famously never matter.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 48 minutes ago