this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
332 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3961 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

she would be retiring after she served, like every other president does, and we would lose her voice.

That's not a rule, you know. John Quincy Adams served in the House after being President, Andrew Johnson became a Senator, and Taft got appointed to the SCOTUS.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I know, but it's precedent. And I'm sure the secret service wouldn't love her continuing to be active in politics.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I don’t think the secret service gets an opinion on what former presidents do for work

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don’t know about Quincy adams, but the other two do not represent what I want more of in American politics

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The point is that retiring from open politics is a choice, not a requirement.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My point is that it’s too much to ask of her to be president for eight years and then continue nobly serving her country.

The people who still want to be in politics after that aren’t doing it for good reasons.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was with you on the first sentence.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

…but you think Andrew Jackson and Taft were doing what was best for the country?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What? Your comment was about it being a lot to ask of AOC.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yes, because people don’t want to do that unless there’s a corrupt reason for it, like with Taft and Jackson. It would be way too much to ask of a non corrupt person.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Exactly. I mean just look at how a former President conducted the dismissal of bipartisan border legislation!