this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Memes

1137 readers
80 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The memes make themselves

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Automatically screams "uneducated" to me. Such an easy thing to not get wrong.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (4 children)

As a non native English speaker, that is the grammar mistake that most baffles me in natives. Like, how does anybody think that “of” is the right word there, how does it make sense in their heads.

True 🦴🍎☕️ material, if it weren’t that absurdly common.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's like when they mess up they're, their and there. It doesn't make any sense until you read it out loud

[–] [email protected] 0 points 16 hours ago

Should of is so much worse though. There/they're/their I can excuse as being dyslexic or English as a second language. But should of/could of speaks to a deep problem. The person who types it does not consider what they say.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When spoken should've can sound a lot like should of or shoulda depending on the dialect. Most native speakers don't really think about gammer rules when writing informally, they just write how they speak.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

shoulda makes vastly more sense, and is precisely the kind of thing that tends to become slang and eventually just the standard spelling, like "dunno" or "gotcha".

"should of" just feels like people know it should be two words, but don't know how it's spelled, and instead of just spelling it phonetically they make something half-phonetic up.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I say shoulda, gonna, etc. I'm never going to mix up should've with should of. It doesn't make ANY fucking sense typed out. I discount everything else a person has said if they type either.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I think the mistake might come from a lack of reading. The contraction "should've" is often used in speech, which might be mistakenly written as "should of" if you don't read a lot and see it written properly all the time. We've mostly lost the voiced quality of "v" at the ends of words like that, so it's basically pronounced "should-uf" in American English.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

i just learned yesterday that apparently america teaches kids to read not by, you know, having them read things, but by memorizing made-up rules to.. guess at how words are pronounced and what they mean..

this uh, explains a lot about why america is why it is, i feel.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean, it's rather obvious it's just written down as it's spoken - like "bone apple tea". But while it's relatable that someone who doesn't know any French cannot write "bon appétit", I don't get how a native speaker could write "should of" and thinking yeah that makes complete sense.

It's also not an auto-correct problem like "there, they're, their" may have originated (I hope it did).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I understand to some extent, thanks!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 15 hours ago

No excuses. People who type should of/could of have brain dysfunction.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

I think it comes from people shortening it to should've which then got warped into should of