this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
506 points (85.3% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2259 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Progressives should not make the same mistake that Ernst Thälmann made in 1932. The leader of the German Communist Party, Thälmann saw mainstream liberals as his enemies, and so the center and left never joined forces against the Nazis. Thälmann famously said that 'some Nazi trees must not be allowed to overshadow a forest' of social democrats, whom he sneeringly called 'social fascists.'

After Adolf Hitler gained power in 1933, Thälmann was arrested. He was shot on Hitler’s orders in Buchenwald concentration camp in 1944."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Your solution to defeating the duopoly is continuing giving them power and participating in it?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

It's not a way to defeat the duopoly, it's a way to survive under it.

Voting 3rd party is also not a way to defeat the duopoly.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Give me a reasonable alternative and I'll take it.

You don't name a candidate to vote for, just say we shouldn't participate.

Who do you think scares Donnie more, Harris or your non-participation?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Would you like your vote to matter after November?

Then yes, I'm pushing the duopoly this time around.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's not like your vote matters now. Money has all the power in this country, voters have none. When 1 billionaire has more political influence than entire states you have no power. You've surrendered your power to the donor class.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/11/opinion/politicians-voters.html nyt. "Despite extensive public outreach...11%..." The NEW YORK TIMES, of all publications!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

This is the epitome of why Democrats hate Trump. He says the quiet things out loud. He has said 'I dont care about you. I just want your vote.'

This article confirms this, the Princeton study from 2012 confirms this. Several sources have confirmed politicians don't care about us, only the monied class

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Who do you think has a better chance of fixing that? Putin's orange Fleshlight? The chick he had dinner with? Brainworm? Some other rando that gets less than 1% of the vote?

I hear you...it's a problem...

Throwing your vote away this cycle ensures that your vote will never matter again.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The vote thrown away is the vote that's cast out of fear. The dnc's entire platform for the last few decades has been. We are not the other guy. You were casting a vote in opposition to the other guy, not in favor of policy or legislation, but not the other guy, that's a protest vote

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No...I'm voting for policy this time around. If I get the state exception for state taxes I get a point and a half back.

Trump's tariffs should fucking terrify everyone...think shit is expensive now, wait until that goes through.

What's the 3rd parties offering that has a remote chance of dealing with either of those problems?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What policy, the one that was hastily copy/pasted from Biden's website?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Throw your vote away...wipe Palestine off the map...increase prices by 20% across the board...make sure women's healthcare is never again a choice in this nation.

I hope your high horse can carry you over the flaming wreck that'll be the USA when your boy or girl doesn't get 1% but manages to swing the vote in those battleground states.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't know what you're going on about. There's nearly no Palestine remaining to begin with. There's very few remaining standing structures left in Gaza. The unlimited amounts of money and weapons Biden/Harris has provided has allow Netanyahu to 'finish the job.' And if he's not able to finish the job by January, Harris is already committed more money and weapons to him to allow him to finish it.

I'm not concerned about that possible fictitious 20% that may happen when we're living right now with stagnant wages, unaffordable housing, no access to healthcare or education. While they have you terrified of things that might happen, you're actively ignoring what's going on right now, but that's the entire intent of distracting you from the now.

If you haven't been paying attention, women's health care lost their rights to reproductive care during a Biden administration. They fucked around for 50 years and found out. But abortion being a states rights issue is what Biden had advocated his entire Congressional career.

If your party was so concerned, they should have made an effort to earn my vote. But even if they had tried, genocide is the red line for a majority of people with any type of conscious or morals.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Cool story bro...enjoy the end of Democracy.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

End of democracy while you are demanding everyone support a candidate that's never won an election, primary, or electoral vote, that was appointed with no contest?

Cool story bro

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Ahh...the Trumpster fire reveals it's self.

It's only a matter of time before the weird conservative talking points start popping out in these debates.

Nice try. How does dog taste btw?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

So if they can't vote for their views now, and we keep pushing the duopoly, when do we get democracy?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

That’s the neat part… you don’t.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's the thing, they never do. They have been pushing the lesser evil splitting the vote bullshit for over 150 years. The only people that benefits is the wealthy

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Were the party system changes before then more due to

  • a major party crushing the other major party, and then splitting, or

  • a minor party growing and eventually replacing one of the two major parties?

Bonus points if anyone has a source on this.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

October Surprise comes to mind.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When you start doing things that actually work.

Look up the Moral Majority and Jerry Falwell. They would show up at every local GOP organizing event with enough voters to make sure their candidates for jobs like mayor, sheriff, and county clerk got the nod.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Gotcha, I'll keep organizing outside the useless electoral system.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

That's a neat way to say "being too lazy to actually make a difference, but I don't want to feel bad about it".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What laws have you gotten passed?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why would passing laws be my concern? The answer is 0.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That’s a neat way to say “being too lazy to actually make a difference, but I don’t want to feel bad about it”.

Cryophilia said it better than I could, so I'll repeat their comment.

I'll just add that if you aren't interested in passing laws you should vote for Harris if only to annoy the Right.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That’s a neat way to say “being too lazy to actually make a difference, but I don’t want to feel bad about it”.

I don't believe the way forward is by passing laws in a system that cannot be reformed into a good one, so it doesn't make sense to judge my praxis by passing laws within said system.

I'll just add that if you aren't interested in passing laws you should vote for Harris if only to annoy the Right.

I think this right here illustrates your political views perfectly, "owning the chuds" is more important than actually working towards progress.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

I'm sure your outside organizing will be much easier under the "let's arrest or deport everyone that does agree with us, burn all the books with ideas we don't agree with, and you'll never have to vote again" candidate.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don’t believe the way forward is by passing laws

Name one piece of actual progress you've made. One would be nice.

You probably love to rail at Obamacare and point out that it was originally created by Mitt Romney.

Maybe the ACA wasn't perfect, but 40 million people have some health insurance who wouldn't have had it without Obama and the Dems.

What have you done that's helped anyone?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What on Earth is this strawman tangent? Touch grass.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What have you done that’s helped anyone?

It's a simple question.

Either your way of doing things has produced results, or it hasn't.

Talk all you want about 'strawman' and I'll point to 40 million people with some kind of health care.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You're still attacking a strawman, lmao. Again, touch grass.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Let's turn it around.

Explain why me asking you to produce actual results is a 'strawman.'

You keep saying it, so you must have an idea of what it means.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You probably love to rail at Obamacare and point out that it was originally created by Mitt Romney.

Maybe the ACA wasn't perfect, but 40 million people have some health insurance who wouldn't have had it without Obama and the Dems.

I have never railed at Obamacare, nor do I point out that it was created by Romney. You spent the next several comments working off of that same false assumption.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago

Explain why me asking you to produce actual results is a ‘strawman.’

No, I asked you to provide some actual results you've produced.

I cited the ACA as an example of something that has produced results.

You still haven't shown anything like actual progress.