this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Atheism

1967 readers
2 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Using the Bible as strict moral code actually makes you a better human being than most people are in my opinion. With that said, some parts (for example the one about homosexuality) are no longer relevant from a theolgical standpoint, so if someone tries to justify their hatred using the Bible it's on them. I don't say everyone should convert to Christianity, but the Bible might just be the greatest compilation of ethical guidelines to ever exist.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Removed by mod"

The guy shared his opinion and didn't wrote anything offensive. The mods here are being as bigots as the fanatics they hate

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So do you have a copy of the comment...?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

I have no idea why anyone would come here and think it's okay to defend any religion.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

I remember when it was posted, it should be in the modlog anyway

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This user, instead of thinking critically about his views after so many users present evidence against his claims, moans that he "didn't realize what community [they] commented on". Not attempting to interact with or even counter the information and arguments presented, he simply ignores it because his beliefs cannot hold against consideration and reason.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

he simply ignores it because his beliefs cannot hold against consideration and reason.

To me it look like the quality of discussion here is not really worth spending time with, they probably didn't bother responding

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

My problem with what you said comes entirely from my personal experience. Most of the worst people I've come across in life have been theological Christians. Atheists tend to be bound by their own ethics, which I've found to be far more powerful than someone telling you how to behave.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think it's less the community and more the complete lack of logic based on what the text is their holy book says. If you use the Bible as a moral code, you are a horrible person

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Exactly, I murder and rape as much as I want. Which is zero. Because I'm not fucked up.

If the only thing stopping me from doing stuff like that is the words in an old book.... There may be another problem there.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Whaaaaat? You saying I should have charged an extra goat for my 12 year old daughter?!?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

So then explain to me why it was ok for God to order his followers to destroy the Tower of Babel and slaughter those building it? I believe God's logic was, "If they complete this tower, it'll show the world they don't need me, and we can't have that."

How exactly was that ethical? Or should we discuss being allowed to beat your slave, so long as they don't die within three days, you haven't commited murder because they are your property? Is that the ethics and morality you're speaking of?

Or maybe it's the "an eye for an eye" part, where revenge is completely justified? I believe it took a Hindu nationalist to add "makes the world blind" to actually make that statement ethical.

Or maybe you're trying to discuss one of the many, many instances of rape that occurs in the bible, but it's completely justified and ethical because God said so?

Personally, if you base your morals and ethics off of the Bible, you're a piece of shit who justifies their immoral behavior using an outdated text as some kind of shield because you think, so long as you repent riiiiiiiiight before you eat the big one, you're good. 🙄

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

So if you ignore all the bad stuff, it’s full of good stuff? Brilliant!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

This feels like satire, and that's saying a lot

In my opinion, people who don't need the threat of eternal damnation to be "good" people have better morals because they aren't motivated by anything other than just not being a piece of shit. They're naturally good people

You're telling me if someone has the urge to murder, but this fairy tale sky daddy is telling them they'll be in eternal pain for doing so, that they're morally better than someone who doesn't have the urge to murder? "I would love to kill someone but I'm a selfish evil asshole and I myself don't want to be in pain so I won't kill this person, not out of empathy, but out of selfishness"

You gotta be trolling

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you realize that there has been a great wealth of ethical discussion in the 1700 years since the Bible was compiled?

And you're seriously going to tell me that the BIBLE, which condones genocide, slavery, the murder of homosexuals, etc, is more moral or ethical than ANYTHING that has been compiled in that time? Half of the Bible was written by litteral genocidal warmongers.

You could put two random children's books together, and it would be a far superior compilation of morals than the Bible.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The bible is different texts wrote by different people. Many people refer the canonical gospels as the bible, halvar is probably talking about that part

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The canonical gospels, where thought crime is first introduced into the religion? Where the founder of the religion declares that everyone who doesn't agree with him is doomed to eternal torture? Are you sure that's an argument you want to make?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Just curious, have you actually read the gospels?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

"not that part, this part"