I agree. But I don't see the "damned if you do and damned if you don't" attitudes toward them helping the goal of fending off fascism.
Biased is not the same as promoting disinformation. Please address the argument presented, not the one you'd prefer to address.
When you can demonstrate that HuffPo and Salon followers are just as consistently misinformed about current events as the Fox News audience, I will concede your point.
Good luck!
If they break the rules, they get this criticism. If they don't break the rules, they get accused of being spineless and unwilling to fight. They really have no way to win, do they?
No one is calling the Democrats perfect or suggesting they couldn't be better. But they are demonstrably better than the GOP, even if that's a low bar. They consistently pass legislation and enact policies to the benefit of the whole nation, not just the donor class.
When the complaint is that they're not good enough, they're being blamed for not catering exclusively to the progressive base the way Republicans cater to theirs. Which refutes the notion that "both sides are the same" on its own.
Yes, we should hold their feet to the fire and convince them to do better. But we should do it without boosting Republican talking points like "both sides." Better to say "they're good, but they could be better."
Sure, innocent until proven guilty. But the trend has been pretty consistent to the point that the accusation is highly credible and worth investigating.
Every accusation from them is a confession. This statement holds true more often than not.
Sure. If that makes you feel better.
Why is there a post from Fox News? I thought we only wanted legitimate news sources.
You don't have to vote for the status quo, you could shake it up and put someone in there who isn't a complete shit-bag.
But that's not how Texas does things. They only make things worse and call it freedom.
He's under an injunction against quietly transferring funds around in case he tries to hide it. Let's be honest, he probably has accounts he hasn't declared that should be accounted for. If it's a legitimate expense all he had to do was let the observer know what he was doing and why. But instead he did it hoping it wouldn't be noticed.
He's a moron.
The rules have already been broken when it suits Republicans. Reciprocity continues to be fair play.