this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
631 points (93.9% liked)

People Twitter

7654 readers
991 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Specifically, no one is comparing them except you. It's okay for two groups of people to have shitty experiences at once. It's not a competition or a fight, I don't understand why people keep trying to insist on making it a "one vs the other" thing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Really? Nobody compares them? Maybe not here, but... Seriously? Is this your first day on the internet?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can only speak for myself. If you're trying to lay the entirety of the Internet's behavior on a specific person or group of people then that's a pretty shitty personal take that you can take personal responsibility for.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Specifically, no one is comparing them except you.

You just said this though. How is this just speaking for yourself?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Would you like me to amend it to "No in this immediate conversation is comparing the two"? I figured you got that considering you said

Maybe not here

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Why are you getting so defensive about me pointing out the behavior of other people on the internet? Kind of a weird reaction.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As a third party, it's probably because you're being pedantic. No one in the conversation was originally comparing misogyny to misandry. So after the comment "it's not even comparable" it's obvious that the following comment of "no one's comparing them" means this conversation. So really harping on the idea of anybody anywhere on the internet comparing these things is irrelevant.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I was not being pedantic, I was responding to ~~your~~ their argument before ~~you~~ they straight up changed it mid conversation.

Edit: fixed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

As a third party ...

Wasn't me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Oh I guess that completely shuts down my argument... wait, no. Nevermind.