this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
19 points (74.4% liked)

Memes

45548 readers
1146 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Socialists don't hate markets, they hate workers not having any power or democratic choice in how they interact in the market.

Workers owning the means of production just means the workers are doing the same work but they are in ownership of the factory and the profits. They will still sell the products they produce in a marketplace.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How would that even work.

It's very very easy to do something like have a capitalist system where business and the rich are taxed. But you aren't on about that.

You could divide everything up today. But with change and new business ideas that system will never work. You think the people would want to invest in new automation, new ways of working, new industries. If it means growth and job losses? No never. Just look at the western car industry, or any big government owned industry. People don't want change, even things like running a factory 24/7 instead of a nice 9-5 is difficult.

Then Japan's comes along and does all this new stuff and puts most of the western workforce out of business.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If worker-owned workplaces still operate within a market, there will still be pressure to compete with other companies. People can still come up with new ideas to compete and change can still happen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I, a socialist, hate markets. They are simplistic and functional artifacts of the available way to pass information.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, you would never trade with someone else something you have for something they have? You want to be entirely self sufficient?

If this isn't true, why do think markets serve no purpose?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you really think all exchange of goods is a market?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

So Christmas gifts are a market?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool, what is your preferred replacement and does everyone in this thread agree? You have managed to continue criticism but not offer a replacement yet again.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The ole can have criticism without perfect solutions response. Cool, how useless and pointless of you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm confused, isn't criticism without alternatives itself useless and pointless?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it broadens and deepens understanding.

Alternatives come from that understanding. Criticism is the fundamental step towards alternatives.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, it broadens and deepens understanding

How exactly do you come to that conclusion?

Edit: "Thing bad" doesn't broaden or deepen anything. "Thing has specific shortcomings which aren't present in specific alternative to thing" is a useful criticism. Criticism without alternatives is just called complaining.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Do they actually trust their coworkers to run the company without tanking it almost immediatly? Most of my coworkers can barely make it through their own tasks without fucking something up, let alone actually having input on how the business is run.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

if you dont raise your children to be adults, they won't act like adults when they grow up. A revolution would mean people learning entirely new skills, like making decisions in the workplace. Most workers have no agency, theyre treated like machines, so I dont expect people raised in that society to know how to run a completely different one from scratch. Revolution is a process, it has to be built. Keep shitting on your coworkers tho, im sure its a productive activity

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They can't even learn to do the tasks they are expected to do now. Even with frequent coaching. How the fuck can you expect them to learn to make business decisions?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You've clearly never worked close with anyone making business decisions in the real world.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I used to work for a food type company and the way they decided to import and sell stuff locally was if the board of directors (the CEO who inherited the company from daddy + his siblings) liked the item. They hired someone, my coworker, to actually run the market tests and everything and then promptly ignored any suggestion she had to make about the viability of this product on the local market, instead relegating her to a busser that was in charge of ordering the samples they decided they wanted.

I remember one item nobody liked (they would give us the remaining samples in the break room like some dogs getting the leftovers), but one of the siblings liked it and they got that close to putting it on the market because of it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Most of my coworkers can barely make it through their own tasks

I guess you haven't met many CEOs, then.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@lightnsfw @dingus
You really think the people currently running your company are any different from those other coworkers?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think they have education related to the running of a large company whereas most of my coworkers barely made it through their IT certs and have some of the stupidest takes regarding how things should be done I've ever heard in my life.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Education related to the exploitation of their workers

Ftfy

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Some of the workers may be managerial. But the managerial workers don't own a disproportionate amount of the company, and they're not considered the "superior" of any other workers.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Most of my coworkers can barely make it through their own tasks without fucking something up

This is a problem with the company you work for, not your coworkers. I'm sure if they were paid more, were given more agency, and received better training, they'd be better elployees

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, they're just idiots. Myself and others have had the same training and responsibilities and do fine. It's not that difficult of a job.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

i shall surely reap the rewards of working at the same level as these irredeemably dumb people. then i will prove my point online or something

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Either that or the reason they purposefully hire meth-addled freaks is because they want desperate people who won't fight for any of those things.

Source: Friend who works in a warehouse and has coworkers who are obviously there to get a paycheck to afford their fix and then move on. It's the company culture. They could choose to hire better people, or mentor the people who could grow, they don't.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I trust my average coworker much more than the average CEO.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Highly depends on your coworkers. My current coworkers? Yeah they're great, we have two electrical engineers on my team, buncha geniuses.

My last job? Oh man I wouldn't trust those guys as far as I could throw em.