politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I can't comment on him enduring four more years of leading the nation, but he would have won the votes. He was never my top option in the past. But at this point, the democratic party is playing with fire. Let's just hope it pays off.
That is exactly what this is about, not that he hasn't done the job until now.
No. This is about him saying he would tax the billionaires, and the billionaires freaked out.
Exactly why Sanders didn't win the nomination when he went against Clinton.
...is it? I've not seen anyone mention such a thing.
Why would they?
Then how would you know?
I thought leaving him in was playing with fire.
Nope. Because now the party is in real disarray. Mark my words: if Trump wins, it will be because of what happened today. And the democrats are to blame. Yes, yes, Russia, China, Iran, all doing an excellent disinformation campaign, yes, yes, the GOP is compromised, etc. But ultimately, the democrats opened the floodgates of opportunity for Trump to win "because the gates looked too rusty and we need to replace them."
Biden was fine. And I didn't even like Biden. I would have preferred Sanders over him or Clinton. But we know what the elite dems did to him.
They were going to lose if he stayed in.
No, they weren't. But anyway, it doesn't matter at this point. We will never know.
Who was saying they weren't?
The people who mattered. Including the academic who has correctly predicted all presidential elections (except for the Bush/Gore one.)
But anyway, I really hope that this Harris renewed wave is truly substantial.
Which is who? The ones who mattered got him to step down.
I don't know, man. I just hope this plays out well - it seems to be the case so far. Crossing fingers.
I'm definitely more hopeful now, especially with the conversations happening, the coverage the Democrats are getting, and the fact that there is energy around the campaign.
Biden was far better of a President than I thought he'd be. But the way our dumb media works, and the way our elections are done, there is almost no way he was going to win after that debate performance. Then pile on the performances after that.
Trump and lie, lie, lie and openly state he's going to be a dictator out for personal vendettas and the "liberal media" is going to maybe mention that, then move on to talking about how frail and senile Biden is. Even if he's only lost a bit of his edge.
Let's have a primary of sorts, and pick the candidate that can most likely WIN.
See, that's the issue with this country. There is a dude who dry-humps all your moms without their consent, and calls her a whore, on one side, oh, but the dude who is trying to stop the dry-humping is the one who's not good because "the debate!!!!!!!!!!!!"
I really don't see how this has any real negative effect. A large portion of voters would vote for my dog over Trump, and every one of those voters will happily switch over to Harris. And now we have a sharper more energetic candidate to win over the rest. And everyone always says a month = 10 years in politics, so 4 months should be plenty of time.
I just hope you're right, man.