Technology

59192 readers

2513 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Nightshade, the free tool that ‘poisons’ AI models, is now available for artists to use (venturebeat.com)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

109 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I hope every artist starts using it.

AI art isn't real art.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Your opinion, not a fact. Most art is as derivative or more than AI art.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

No, that's fact. AI-generated images aren't art. They're hallucinations without meaning or purpose.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Stupid opinion. If I ask AI to draw an image, that has no meaning or purpose? So if I did the exact same thing with a pencil then it's suddenly art? AI is just a tool and people like you need to get over it or fully commit and say anything digital isn't art because a computer really did it. Anything made in Photoshop can't be art according to you because a program made it. Blender renders aren't art because a computer generated it. All you did in either case was tell it what to do.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Do you reply to people this way in person ?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

If they're stupid yes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Just because some creator (or in your words hallucinator) did not intend meaning, does not prohibit or somehow prevent any beholder to still derive or instill meaning. Your weird comment is also art. The webpage or app we are viewing it on is art. Remember this?. The definition you use may suit you personally, but words are for communicating with others, and to most others it's definition will be crucially different than yours. Consider adjusting your view or the words you use.