this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
18 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

1003 readers
26 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have often heard ultra-lefts describe Marxists who oppose settler-colonialism and uphold AES as being "Third Worldists".

Looking at what people like Jason Unruhe have to say about the topic, Third Worldism does not seem entirely baseless (e.g. the proletariat in the imperial core more often being labor aristocrats).

So, what are our thoughts on Third Worldism?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The problem is that Africa and India are less industrialized; there are places to hide.

The fact that Americans and Canadians are strewn about but also mostly coagulated in the same areas doesn't help matters either.

Did you know that the USA has the highest prison population in the world?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Look i don't want to keep talking about this because i will get pissed off.

The people from the US won't have a revolution because there is no political will by the working class, it's as simple as that. And i won't change my views until the american working class does something to prove me wrong.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They've done near-mass uprisings, at least, like 1918 to 1919, but yes, no real socialist revolution, it's true.

I suspect that as the USA and Europe lose more of their grip on Eastern Europe, Africa, Latin America, and Asia, we will see more strife in the imperial core (well, I certainly hope they lose more of their grip, but I'm cautiously optimistic!)

Hopefully, we agree on that, at least.

stalin heart hands