this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)
Apple
19095 readers
1 users here now
Welcome
to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!
Rules:
- No NSFW Content
- No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
- No Ads / Spamming
Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread
Communities of Interest:
Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple
Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode
Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
LMAOOOO get fucked, Apple we love your hardware and your software (when properly tested first), but given you’ve had a great run with the fees now it’s time to let us own our hardware at least a little.
5%? Not messing around. No wrist slap there.
Let’s go freedom, let’s go Apple-but-the-right-way (please)!
5% daily, of global revenue.
Now that's how penalties should work.
With all respect for people who hate Apple (myself included), this doesn't look like how penalties should work. I doubt there are adequate standards of how an entity like EU can request any percentage of global revenue from anyone. What would you do if you request any more than Apple considers adequate and decides it's more profitable to just leave your market?
Problem is companies like to use global accounting schemes to hide/move profit.
If it was “5% of profit in the EU” then overnight Apple would suddenly make 0 profit in the EU due to “brand licensing fees” to Apple Cayman Islands Incorporated.
They cannot request it from anyone, only for those who chose to operate in EU jurisdiction.
Apple is free to not operate in the EU.
And I would welcome that. Most other people will probably not though.
I don't know, I'm still waiting for you to describe the problem.
The problem is how government entities dictate media corporations what to do. This time it's pro-consumer, the other time it might not be so.
That's not a problem, its exactly what governments exist for. Creating and enforcing laws.
The problem us that some corporations manage to manipulate governments by bribery to avoid regulation, not that government or regulations exist.
Are you a libertarian?
No “just” is the beauty
Sure, they can try, I suppose… but that’s a lotta billions and a huge % of global rev
Whoever picked that color scheme is nuts. I can barely tell which are supposed to be the Americas and Europe.
Cheer?
I mean it's kind of classic issues with unions. It doesn't work if only place is doing it, but the more that do, the less market they have access to. Europe is a pretty decent sized market, so it may still hurt. And if they do leave, well China certainly has a lot of their own homegrown solutions, so that's not an entirely unreasonable option.