this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
NonCredibleDefense
6623 readers
48 users here now
A community for your defence shitposting needs
Rules
1. Be nice
Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.
2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes
If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.
3. Content must be relevant
Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.
4. No racism / hatespeech
No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.
5. No politics
We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.
6. No seriousposting
We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.
7. No classified material
Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.
8. Source artwork
If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.
9. No low-effort posts
No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.
10. Don't get us banned
No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.
11. No misinformation
NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.
Join our Matrix chatroom
Other communities you may be interested in
Banner made by u/Fertility18
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
tell me again, not to worry :
:Russia and India sign weapons deal - reports
Early this morning, there were rumblings among some Russian media outlets that officials from Moscow's only state weapons firm, Rosoboronexport, were in talks with India over signing a weapons deal.
The deal would see Russia hand over some of its anti-aircraft capability and technology to India.
"Rosoboronexport is working with Indian private and public enterprises to organise joint production of aviation weapons and integrate them into the existing aviation fleet in India," RIA cited the company's general director, Alexander Mikheyev, as saying.
Now, another state news agency says that deal has been signed.
Tass said the deal to supply and produce "Igla" air defence systems concluded early this morning - meaning that Russia will give some of its hand-held anti-aircraft missiles to India - and allow production of the Igla there under licence.
It quoted a "top arms export official" in its report. "
[x]
so russians lost another su-25 today yet they sell newly manufactured manpads to india, for rupees, that they have problems to spend anywhere else than in india, and india is not selling them weapons because that deal goes the other way around. truly a 7d backgammon with time travel move
You can't lose a 1000 soldiers every day and if India steps up. It leads to conflict with China. I don't think it's good news. But losing 1000 soldiers a day when you only have 150,000 soldiers deployed is not a good situation. Russia even states they have a 150,000.