this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
412 points (97.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

24628 readers
560 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Would be fine if it used a custom parameter for their tags. Using class names makes for bad accessibility.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (6 children)

How are class names relevant for accessibility?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (4 children)

https://lemmy.zip/comment/19872383

Usability by third-parties. A webpage is not a pdf.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You think only aria-attributes are accessibility? Most accessible is, what you not need additional tools and interpreters for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

No, it's of course not just aria attributes. But it's definitely not "how easy can I create user CSS". Accessibility is a term of art, you can't just expand its meaning to whatever you want.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accessibility

[–] [email protected] -2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Look, if it hinders me in my workarounds for my ADHD while every other framework does less so, then accessibility is worse. Shut up with your trademark gatekeeping bullshit.

Also,

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)